Suppr超能文献

国际儿童保育实践研究:婴儿睡眠环境

International Child Care Practices Study: infant sleeping environment.

作者信息

Nelson E A, Taylor B J, Jenik A, Vance J, Walmsley K, Pollard K, Freemantle M, Ewing D, Einspieler C, Engele H, Ritter P, Hildes-Ripstein G E, Arancibia M, Ji X, Li H, Bedard C, Helweg-Larsen K, Sidenius K, Karlqvist S, Poets C, Barko E, Kiberd B, McDonnell M, Donzelli G, Piumelli R, Landini L, Giustardi A, Nishida H, Fukui S, Sawaguchi T, Ino M, Horiuchi T, Oguchi K, Williams S, Perk Y, Tappin D, Milerad J, Wennborg M, Aryayev N, Nepomyashchaya V

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 6/F Clinical Science Building, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Early Hum Dev. 2001 Apr;62(1):43-55. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(01)00116-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The International Child Care Practices Study (ICCPS) has collected descriptive data from 21 centres in 17 countries. In this report, data are presented on the infant sleeping environment with the main focus being sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) risk factors (bedsharing and infant using a pillow) and protective factors (infant sharing a room with adult) that are not yet well established in the literature.

METHODS

Using a standardised protocol, parents of infants were surveyed at birth by interview and at 3 months of age mainly by postal questionnaire. Centres were grouped according to geographic location. Also indicated was the level of SIDS awareness in the community, i.e. whether any campaigns or messages to "reduce the risks of SIDS" were available at the time of the survey.

RESULTS

Birth interview data were available for 5488 individual families and 4656 (85%) returned questionnaires at 3 months. Rates of bedsharing varied considerably (2-88%) and it appeared to be more common in the samples with a lower awareness of SIDS, but not necessarily a high SIDS rate. Countries with higher rates of bedsharing appeared to have a greater proportion of infants bedsharing for a longer duration (>5 h). Rates of room sharing varied (58-100%) with some of the lowest rates noted in centres with a higher awareness of SIDS. Rates of pillow use ranged from 4% to 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

It is likely that methods of bedsharing differ cross-culturally, and although further details were sought on different bedsharing practices, it was not possible to build up a composite picture of "typical" bedsharing practices in these different communities. These data highlight interesting patterns in child care in these diverse populations. Although these results should not be used to imply that any particular child care practice either increases or decreases the risk of SIDS, these findings should help to inject caution into the process of developing SIDS prevention campaigns for non-Western cultures.

摘要

背景

国际儿童保育实践研究(ICCPS)收集了来自17个国家21个中心的描述性数据。在本报告中,呈现了婴儿睡眠环境的数据,主要关注婴儿猝死综合征(SIDS)的风险因素(同床睡眠和婴儿使用枕头)以及保护因素(婴儿与成人共用一个房间),这些因素在文献中尚未得到充分证实。

方法

采用标准化方案,在婴儿出生时通过访谈对其父母进行调查,并在婴儿3个月大时主要通过邮寄问卷进行调查。各中心根据地理位置进行分组。还指出了社区对SIDS的认知水平,即在调查时是否有任何“降低SIDS风险”的活动或信息。

结果

有5488个家庭提供了出生访谈数据,4656个家庭(85%)在3个月时返回了问卷。同床睡眠的比例差异很大(2% - 88%),在对SIDS认知较低的样本中似乎更为常见,但不一定是SIDS发生率高的样本。同床睡眠比例较高的国家,较长时间(>5小时)同床睡眠的婴儿比例似乎更大。共用房间的比例各不相同(58% - 100%),在对SIDS认知较高的中心,该比例是最低的。使用枕头的比例在4%至95%之间。

结论

不同文化背景下同床睡眠的方式可能不同,尽管我们进一步了解了不同的同床睡眠习惯,但仍无法构建出这些不同社区“典型”同床睡眠习惯的综合图景。这些数据凸显了这些不同人群在儿童保育方面的有趣模式。虽然这些结果不应被用来暗示任何特定的儿童保育习惯会增加或降低SIDS的风险,但这些发现应有助于在为非西方文化制定SIDS预防活动的过程中注入谨慎态度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验