Naeve W
Z Rechtsmed. 1975;75(4):299-309. doi: 10.1007/BF00201185.
The problematic nature of medico-legal opinions on fatal auto-erotic accidents made for private accident insurance companies is outlined in a survey based on our own records. Taking the "General Insuranc Terms for Accident Insurance" (AUB) into consideration, guidelines for the forming of such opinions are given. One is warned not to form summary opinions. Decisive is the insured's state of conciousness when the accident was triggered. Only in exceptional cases can an insurance covered accident be rejected because of a body injury inflicted by the insured on himself (see article). These actions do not usually result in external injury to the body. Experience proves that "ideal conditions" for forming an opinion are rarely given. Also, the nature of the death situation is such that often the corpse is discovered only days after death. From the outset, forming a medical opinion is beset with varying degrees of difficulty depending upon which category of auto-erotic activities the accident falls into: 1. direct stimulation of the erotic regions, 2. stimulation of sexual centers in the central nervous system, 3. the creation of fear and anguish in the context of masochistic perversion. According the presently valid insurance terms (AUB), cases of auto-erotic electrocution are to be regarded as covered. A disturbance of consciousness--with the exception of such disturbances following the influence of alcohol, medicines or narcotics--cannot be assumed for the moment in which the accident was triggered. At this moment body "integrity" was also intact. Accidents through strangulation, respectively asphyxiation (plastic bags etc.), usually occur during a disturbance of consciousness of the victim. This disturbance is the result of cerebral hypoxia, that is a result of strangulation, respectively external respiratory obstruction. The forming of a medical opinion for insurance purposes on auto-erotic accidents with clearly recognizable masochistic tendency is particularly difficult. A medical decision is only possible when an exact examination and description of the scene of the accident are available. In these instances, mechanical devices rigged by the victim often do not permit with sufficient probability to exclude the possibility of an accident without disturbance of consciousness on the part of the insured.
基于我们自己的记录进行的一项调查概述了为私人事故保险公司出具的关于致命性自淫事故的法医学意见的问题本质。考虑到《事故保险通用保险条款》(AUB),给出了形成此类意见的指导方针。有人警告不要形成总结性意见。关键在于事故发生时被保险人的意识状态。只有在特殊情况下,才能因被保险人对自己造成的身体伤害而拒绝承保事故(见条款)。这些行为通常不会导致身体外部受伤。经验证明,形成意见的“理想条件”很少具备。而且,死亡情况的性质往往是尸体在死后数天才被发现。从一开始,根据事故属于哪一类自淫活动,形成医学意见就会面临不同程度的困难:1. 对性敏感区域的直接刺激;2. 对中枢神经系统性中枢的刺激;3. 在受虐变态背景下制造恐惧和痛苦。根据目前有效的保险条款(AUB),自淫触电事故应被视为承保范围。在事故发生的那一刻,不能假定存在意识障碍——酒精、药物或麻醉品影响后的此类障碍除外。此时身体“完整性”也未受损。勒死或窒息(塑料袋等)导致的事故通常发生在受害者意识障碍期间。这种障碍是脑缺氧的结果,即勒死或外部呼吸阻塞的结果。对于具有明显可识别受虐倾向的自淫事故,出于保险目的形成医学意见尤其困难。只有在对事故现场进行精确检查和描述后,才有可能做出医学决定。在这些情况下,受害者设置的机械设备往往无法充分排除被保险人在意识未受干扰的情况下发生事故的可能性。