Levy D, Lumley T, Sheppard L, Kaufman J, Checkoway H
Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7232, USA.
Epidemiology. 2001 Mar;12(2):186-92. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200103000-00010.
The case-crossover design was proposed for the study of a transient effect of an intermittent exposure on the subsequent occurrence of a rare acute-onset disease. This design can be an alternative to Poisson time series regression for studying the health effects of fine particulate matter air pollution. Characteristics of time-series of particulate matter, including long-term time trends, seasonal trends, and short-term autocorrelations, require that referent selection in the case-crossover design be considered carefully and adapted to minimize bias. We performed simulations to evaluate the bias associated with various referent selection strategies for a proposed case-crossover study of associations between particulate matter and primary cardiac arrest. Some a priori reasonable strategies were associated with a relative bias as large as 10%, but for most strategies the relative bias was less than 2% with confidence interval coverage within 1% of the nominal level. We show that referent selection for case-crossover designs raises the same issues as selection of smoothing method for time series analyses. In addition, conditional logistic regression analysis is not strictly valid for some case-crossover designs, introducing further bias.
病例交叉设计被提出来用于研究间歇性暴露对随后罕见急性发病疾病发生的短暂影响。这种设计可以作为泊松时间序列回归的替代方法,用于研究细颗粒物空气污染对健康的影响。颗粒物时间序列的特征,包括长期时间趋势、季节性趋势和短期自相关性,要求在病例交叉设计中仔细考虑并调整对照选择,以尽量减少偏差。我们进行了模拟,以评估在一项关于颗粒物与原发性心脏骤停之间关联的拟议病例交叉研究中,各种对照选择策略所带来的偏差。一些先验合理的策略所带来的相对偏差高达10%,但对于大多数策略,相对偏差小于2%,置信区间覆盖范围在名义水平的1%以内。我们表明,病例交叉设计的对照选择与时间序列分析中平滑方法的选择存在相同的问题。此外,条件逻辑回归分析对于某些病例交叉设计并不严格有效,会引入进一步的偏差。