• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估临床局限性前列腺癌患者淋巴结转移情况的人工神经网络模型

Artificial neural network model for the assessment of lymph node spread in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

作者信息

Batuello J T, Gamito E J, Crawford E D, Han M, Partin A W, McLeod D G, ODonnell C

机构信息

Artificial Neural Networks in CaP Project and the, Denver, Colorado 80209, USA

出版信息

Urology. 2001 Mar;57(3):481-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01039-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01039-6
PMID:11248624
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop an artificial neural network (ANN) model to predict lymph node (LN) spread in men with clinically localized prostate cancer and to describe a clinically useful method for interpreting the ANN's output scores.

METHODS

A simple, feed-forward ANN was trained and validated using clinical and pathologic data from two institutions (n = 6135 and n = 319). The clinical stage, biopsy Gleason sum, and prostate-specific antigen level were the input parameters and the presence or absence of LN spread was the output parameter. Patients with similar ANN outputs were grouped and assumed to be part of a cohort. The prevalence of LN spread for each of these patient cohorts was plotted against the range of ANN outputs to create a risk curve.

RESULTS

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the first and second validation data sets was 0.81 and 0.77, respectively. At an ANN output cutoff of 0.3, the sensitivity achieved for each validation set was 63.8% and 44.4%; the specificity was 81.5% and 81.3%; the positive predictive value was 13.6% and 6.5%; and the negative predictive value was 98.0% and 98.1%, respectively. The risk curve showed a nearly linear increase (best fit R(2) = 0.972) in the prevalence of LN spread with increases in raw ANN output.

CONCLUSIONS

The ANN's performance on the two validation data sets suggests a role for ANNs in the accurate clinical staging of patients with prostate cancer. The risk curve provides a clinically useful tool that can be used to give patients a realistic assessment of their risk of LN spread.

摘要

目的

开发一种人工神经网络(ANN)模型,以预测临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者的淋巴结(LN)转移情况,并描述一种临床上有用的方法来解释ANN的输出分数。

方法

使用来自两个机构的临床和病理数据(n = 6135和n = 319)对一个简单的前馈ANN进行训练和验证。临床分期、活检Gleason评分总和以及前列腺特异性抗原水平为输入参数,LN转移的有无为输出参数。将具有相似ANN输出的患者分组,并假定为一个队列的一部分。将这些患者队列中每一组的LN转移患病率与ANN输出范围进行绘制,以创建风险曲线。

结果

第一个和第二个验证数据集的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.81和0.77。在ANN输出截断值为0.3时,每个验证集的敏感性分别为63.8%和44.4%;特异性分别为81.5%和81.3%;阳性预测值分别为13.6%和6.5%;阴性预测值分别为98.0%和98.1%。风险曲线显示,随着原始ANN输出的增加,LN转移患病率几乎呈线性增加(最佳拟合R(2)=0.972)。

结论

ANN在两个验证数据集上的表现表明其在前列腺癌患者准确临床分期中具有作用。风险曲线提供了一种临床上有用的工具,可用于让患者对其LN转移风险进行实际评估。

相似文献

1
Artificial neural network model for the assessment of lymph node spread in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.用于评估临床局限性前列腺癌患者淋巴结转移情况的人工神经网络模型
Urology. 2001 Mar;57(3):481-5. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01039-6.
2
Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma.
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8 Suppl):1661-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1661::aid-cncr1180>3.3.co;2-x.
3
Use of artificial neural networks in the clinical staging of prostate cancer: implications for prostate brachytherapy.
Tech Urol. 2000 Jun;6(2):60-3.
4
Novel staging tool for localized prostate cancer: a pilot study using genetic adaptive neural networks.
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):430-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62916-1.
5
Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.使用磁共振成像综合变量、前列腺特异性抗原和 Gleason 评分的术前神经网络预测根治性前列腺切除术后前列腺癌生化复发情况。
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.030.
6
Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict positive surgical margins.使用磁共振成像变量、前列腺特异性抗原和 Gleason 评分联合构建术前神经网络以预测手术切缘阳性情况。
Urology. 2004 Sep;64(3):516-21. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.027.
7
Artificial neural network analysis for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in the Japanese population.用于预测日本人群临床局限性前列腺癌病理分期的人工神经网络分析
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2002 Dec;32(12):530-5. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyf114.
8
Validation of a biopsy-based pathologic algorithm for predicting lymph node metastases in patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma.
Cancer. 2002 Sep 1;95(5):1016-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10811.
9
The use of artificial intelligence technology to predict lymph node spread in men with clinically localized prostate carcinoma.
Cancer. 2000 May 1;88(9):2105-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000501)88:9<2105::aid-cncr16>3.0.co;2-3.
10
Pathologic nodal staging scores in patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a postoperative decision tool.根治性前列腺切除术治疗患者的病理性淋巴结分期评分:一种术后决策工具。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.041. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate cancer nomograms and their application in Asian men: a review.前列腺癌列线图及其在亚洲男性中的应用:综述
Prostate Int. 2024 Mar;12(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.专家系统(ES)和机器学习(ML)在临床泌尿外科应用的系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01585-9.
3
Diagnosis of Common Headaches Using Hybrid Expert-Based Systems.使用基于混合专家系统诊断常见头痛
J Med Signals Sens. 2019 Aug 29;9(3):174-180. doi: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_47_18. eCollection 2019 Jul-Sep.
4
Risk prediction models for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy using prostate-specific antigen and Gleason score.使用前列腺特异性抗原和 Gleason 评分的前列腺癌根治术后生化复发风险预测模型。
Asian J Androl. 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):897-901. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.129940.
5
Artificial neural networks and prostate cancer--tools for diagnosis and management.人工神经网络与前列腺癌——诊断与治疗工具。
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Mar;10(3):174-82. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.9. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
6
Role of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment.盆腔淋巴结清扫术在前列腺癌治疗中的作用。
Korean J Urol. 2011 Jul;52(7):437-45. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.7.437. Epub 2011 Jul 24.
7
Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.前列腺癌预测工具的批判性评价。
Future Oncol. 2009 Dec;5(10):1555-84. doi: 10.2217/fon.09.121.
8
Artificial neural network to predict skeletal metastasis in patients with prostate cancer.用于预测前列腺癌患者骨骼转移的人工神经网络
J Med Syst. 2009 Apr;33(2):91-100. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9168-2.
9
The importance of pelvic lymph node dissection in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.盆腔淋巴结清扫术在临床局限性前列腺癌男性患者中的重要性。
Rev Urol. 2006 Summer;8(3):112-9.
10
Artificial neural networks for decision-making in urologic oncology.用于泌尿外科肿瘤学决策的人工神经网络
Rev Urol. 2003 Winter;5(1):15-21.