Jorgenson J L
International Water Specialist, Washington, DC 20008, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Mar;109 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):113-39. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s1113.
In the last decade four international agreements have focused on a group of chemical substances known as persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Global agreement on the reduction and eventual elimination of these substances by banning their production and trade is a long-term goal. Negotiations for these agreements have focused on the need to correlate data from scientists working on soil and water sampling and air pollution monitoring. Toxicologists and epidemiologists have focused on wildlife and human health effects and understanding patterns of disease requires better access to these data. In the last 20 years, substantial databases have been created and now are becoming available on the Internet. This review is a detailed examination of 2 of the 12 POPs, aldrin and dieldrin, and how scientific groups identify and measure their effects. It draws on research findings from a variety of environmental monitoring networks in the United States. An overview of the ecologic and health effects of aldrin and dieldrin provides examples of how to streamline some of the programs and improve access to mutually useful scientific data. The research groups are located in many government departments, universities, and private organizations. Identifying databases can provide an "information accelerator" useful to a larger audience and can help build better plant and animal research models across scientific fields.
在过去十年里,四项国际协定聚焦于一类被称为持久性有机污染物(POPs)的化学物质。通过禁止其生产和贸易来达成减少并最终消除这些物质的全球协定是一个长期目标。这些协定的谈判聚焦于关联从事土壤和水样采集以及空气污染监测的科学家所获取的数据的必要性。毒理学家和流行病学家关注野生动物和人类健康影响,而了解疾病模式需要更好地获取这些数据。在过去20年里,已经创建了大量数据库,现在可以在互联网上获取。本综述详细考察了12种持久性有机污染物中的两种——艾氏剂和狄氏剂,以及科学团队如何识别和测量它们的影响。它借鉴了美国各种环境监测网络的研究结果。对艾氏剂和狄氏剂的生态及健康影响的概述提供了一些示例,说明如何精简某些项目并改善获取相互有用的科学数据的途径。这些研究团队分布在许多政府部门、大学和私人组织中。识别数据库可以为更广泛的受众提供一个有用的“信息加速器”,并有助于跨科学领域建立更好的动植物研究模型。