Halpern J, Brown B W, Hornberger J
Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Health Research and Policy, HRP Redwood Building, Stanford, California 94305-5405, USA.
Stat Med. 2001 Mar 30;20(6):841-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.703.
Using decision theory, what is an appropriate sample size for a clinical trial, with a binary endpoint? We present a program, suitable for actual planning, which, with some extensions, implements Canner's solution to this question. Examples with a discussion are given. Implications of a Bayesian approach are discussed. Bayesian and Neyman--Pearson approaches are compared.
运用决策理论,对于具有二元终点的临床试验而言,合适的样本量是多少?我们提出了一个适用于实际规划的程序,该程序经过一些扩展后,实现了坎纳对这个问题的解决方案。文中给出了带有讨论的示例。探讨了贝叶斯方法的影响。对贝叶斯方法和奈曼 - 皮尔逊方法进行了比较。