• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机管理的成瘾严重程度指数的初步验证:成瘾严重程度指数-简版(ASI-MV)

Initial validation of a computer-administered Addiction Severity Index: the ASI-MV.

作者信息

Butler S F, Budman S H, Goldman R J, Newman F L, Beckley K E, Trottier D, Cacciola J S

机构信息

Innovative Training Systems, Inc., 199 Wells Avenue, Suite 108, Newton, Massachusetts 02459, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Addict Behav. 2001 Mar;15(1):4-12. doi: 10.1037/0893-164x.15.1.4.

DOI:10.1037/0893-164x.15.1.4
PMID:11255937
Abstract

The Addiction Severity Index--Multimedia Version (ASI-MV) is a CD-ROM-based simulation of the interviewer-administered Addiction Severity Index (ASI). Clients in treatment (N = 202) self-administered the ASI-MV to examine the test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and convergent-discriminant validity of the ASI-MV. Excellent test-retest reliability was observed for composite scores and severity ratings. Criterion validity, tested against the interviewer-administered ASI, was good for the composite scores. For severity ratings, variable agreement was observed between the ASI-MV and each interviewer, suggesting poor interrater reliability among interviewers. This conclusion was bolstered by a finding of superior convergent-discriminant validity for both composite scores and severity ratings compared to the standard ASI. The ASI-MV is a viable alternative to the expensive and potentially unreliable interviewer-administered version.

摘要

成瘾严重程度指数——多媒体版本(ASI-MV)是一种基于光盘的、对由访谈者实施的成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)的模拟。接受治疗的客户(N = 202)自行使用ASI-MV,以检验其重测信度、效标效度和聚合区分效度。在综合得分和严重程度评级方面观察到了出色的重测信度。与访谈者实施的ASI相比,效标效度在综合得分方面表现良好。对于严重程度评级,ASI-MV与每位访谈者之间存在不同程度的一致性,这表明访谈者之间的评分者信度较差。与标准ASI相比,综合得分和严重程度评级均具有更高的聚合区分效度,这一发现支持了这一结论。ASI-MV是昂贵且可能不可靠的访谈者实施版本的可行替代方案。

相似文献

1
Initial validation of a computer-administered Addiction Severity Index: the ASI-MV.计算机管理的成瘾严重程度指数的初步验证:成瘾严重程度指数-简版(ASI-MV)
Psychol Addict Behav. 2001 Mar;15(1):4-12. doi: 10.1037/0893-164x.15.1.4.
2
Validation of the Spanish Addiction Severity Index Multimedia Version (S-ASI-MV).西班牙成瘾严重程度指数多媒体版(S-ASI-MV)的验证
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2009 Jan 1;99(1-3):18-27. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.06.012. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
3
A computer adaptive testing version of the Addiction Severity Index-Multimedia Version (ASI-MV): The Addiction Severity CAT.《成瘾严重程度指数-多媒体版》(ASI-MV)的计算机自适应测试版本:成瘾严重程度计算机自适应测试(Addiction Severity CAT)
Psychol Addict Behav. 2017 May;31(3):265-275. doi: 10.1037/adb0000256. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
4
Validation of the Addiction Severity Index in French-speaking alcoholic patients.成瘾严重程度指数在说法语的酒精使用障碍患者中的验证
J Stud Alcohol. 1996 Nov;57(6):585-90. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1996.57.585.
5
The validity of the interviewer severity ratings in groups of ASI interviewers with varying training.在接受不同培训的成瘾严重程度指数(ASI)访谈者群体中,访谈者严重程度评分的有效性。
Addiction. 2001 Sep;96(9):1297-305. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96912979.x.
6
The effect of computer-mediated administration on self-disclosure of problems on the addiction severity index.计算机中介管理对成瘾严重程度指数上问题自我披露的影响。
J Addict Med. 2009 Dec;3(4):194-203. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e3181902844.
7
Reliability of the Addiction Severity Index self-report form (ASI-SR): a self-administered questionnaire based on the Addiction Severity Index composite score domains.成瘾严重程度指数自评表(ASI-SR)的信度:一份基于成瘾严重程度指数综合评分领域的自填式问卷。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;74(1):9-15. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1666300. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI-J).日本版成瘾严重程度指数(ASI-J)的信度与效度
Nihon Arukoru Yakubutsu Igakkai Zasshi. 2006 Aug;41(4):368-79.
9
The use of case vignettes for Addiction Severity Index training.使用病例 vignettes 进行成瘾严重程度指数培训。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 1997 Sep-Oct;14(5):439-43. doi: 10.1016/s0740-5472(97)00123-2.
10
Studies of the reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index.成瘾严重程度指数的信度和效度研究。
Addiction. 2004 Apr;99(4):398-410; discussion 411-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00665.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Buprenorphine use and setting type among reproductive-aged women self-reporting nonmedical prescription opioid use.报告非医疗目的处方类阿片使用的育龄妇女中丁丙诺啡使用和设置类型。
J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2023 Dec;155:209083. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2023.209083. Epub 2023 May 26.
2
Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention.物质使用障碍:分类、流行病学、神经生物学、临床方面、治疗与预防的全面更新
World Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;22(2):203-229. doi: 10.1002/wps.21073.
3
Associations between prescription stimulant use as prescribed, nonmedical use, and illicit stimulant use among adults evaluated for substance use treatment, 2017-2021.
2017 - 2021年接受物质使用治疗评估的成年人中,按处方使用处方兴奋剂、非医疗用途使用及非法使用兴奋剂之间的关联。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2023 Mar 30;7:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2023.100153. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Substance use, risk behaviours and well-being after admission to a quasi-residential abstinence-based rehabilitation programme: 4-year follow-up.进入基于禁欲的准住院康复项目后的物质使用、风险行为及幸福感:4年随访
BJPsych Open. 2023 Mar 13;9(2):e52. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.23.
5
Construct validity of DSM-5 cannabis use disorder diagnosis and severity levels in adults with problematic substance use.DSM-5 大麻使用障碍诊断和严重程度在有问题物质使用的成年人中的构念效度。
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Nov;155:387-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.09.016. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Spirituality: A Key Component of the Salvation Army's Bridge Programme Model of Treatment in Aotearoa New Zealand.灵性:新西兰救世军治疗模式“桥梁计划”的关键组成部分。
J Relig Health. 2023 Aug;62(4):2563-2584. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01674-7. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
7
Psychiatric Treatment and Repeat Suicide Attempts Among Adults With Substance Use, by HIV Status, United States, 2014-2020.2014 - 2020年美国按艾滋病毒感染状况划分的有物质使用问题的成年人中的精神治疗与重复自杀未遂情况
Public Health Rep. 2023 Sep-Oct;138(5):796-805. doi: 10.1177/00333549221120452. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
8
Characteristics of Adults Aged ≥18 Years Evaluated for Substance Use and Treatment Planning - United States, 2019.成年人药物使用评估和治疗规划:2019 年美国≥18 岁人群特征。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jun 10;71(23):749-756. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7123a1.
9
Characteristics of adults reporting illicitly manufactured fentanyl or heroin use or prescription opioid misuse in the United States, 2019.2019 年美国报告非法制造的芬太尼或海洛因使用或处方阿片类药物滥用的成年人特征。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Dec 1;229(Pt A):109160. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109160. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
10
Nonmedical Use of Xtampza ER and Other Oxycodone Medications in Adults Evaluated for Substance Abuse Treatment: Real-World Data from the Addiction Severity Index-Multimedia Version (ASI-MV).因药物滥用治疗而接受评估的成年人中 Xtampza ER 和其他羟考酮药物的非医疗使用情况:来自成瘾严重程度指数多媒体版(ASI-MV)的真实世界数据。
J Pain Res. 2021 Jun 15;14:1773-1783. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S304805. eCollection 2021.