Rucci P, Maser J D
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.
Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2000 Oct-Dec;9(4):249-56. doi: 10.1017/s1121189x00008381.
The Collaborative Spectrum Project aims to define subthreshold and atyical conditions not sufficiently characterized in the current diagnostic nomenclature and for which adequate assessment instruments are not available. This paper reports on the development and validation of new instruments to assess the spectrum of five psychiatric disorders.
Three multicenter studies and one single-site study were conducted in Italy to assess the validity and reliability of the five spectrum interviews. Another cross-sectional study to validate the panic-agoraphobia spectrum has been conducted in Pittsburgh.
Outpatients attending various university clinics, university students and, in one Italian study, gym attenders were recruited for the studies.
Five structured clinical interview to assess the spectrum of panic-agoraphobia (SCI-PAS), mood (SCI-MOODS), social phobia (SCI-SHY), and the obsessive-compulsive (SCI-OBS) and eating disorder spectra (SCI-ABS) were administered along with a diagnostic interview and a number of self-report and interviewer-rated instruments.
All the domains of the interview showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.61) and satisfactory internal consistency. Mean domain scores were significantly higher in cases than in controls and in patients with the disorder of interest than in patients with other disorders. Convergent validity was satisfactory for panic-agoraphobia, social phobia and obsessive-compulsive spectrum domains. Differences emerged between SCI-ABS and self-report instruments assessing eating disorders. A cut-off score for the panic-agoraphobia spectrum was defined and its clinical validity was tested.
The psychometric properties of the five spectrum interviews are very satisfactory, and studies are currently ongoing to test the clinical validity of all the spectra. Subthreshold and atypical symptoms deserve attention in epidemiological investigation.
协作频谱项目旨在定义当前诊断术语中未充分描述且尚无适当评估工具的阈下和非典型病症。本文报告了用于评估五种精神障碍频谱的新工具的开发与验证情况。
在意大利进行了三项多中心研究和一项单中心研究,以评估这五种频谱访谈的有效性和可靠性。在匹兹堡进行了另一项横断面研究,以验证惊恐 - 场所恐惧症频谱。
招募了在各大学诊所就诊的门诊患者、大学生,在一项意大利研究中还招募了健身房参与者参与研究。
进行了五项结构化临床访谈,以评估惊恐 - 场所恐惧症(SCI - PAS)、情绪(SCI - MOODS)、社交恐惧症(SCI - SHY)、强迫症(SCI - OBS)和进食障碍频谱(SCI - ABS),同时还进行了诊断访谈以及一些自我报告和访谈者评定的工具。
访谈的所有领域均显示出高重测信度(组内相关系数>0.61)和令人满意的内部一致性。病例组的平均领域得分显著高于对照组,患有相关障碍的患者的得分显著高于患有其他障碍的患者。惊恐 - 场所恐惧症、社交恐惧症和强迫症频谱领域的收敛效度令人满意。SCI - ABS与评估进食障碍的自我报告工具之间存在差异。定义了惊恐 - 场所恐惧症频谱的临界值并测试了其临床效度。
这五种频谱访谈的心理测量特性非常令人满意,目前正在进行研究以测试所有频谱的临床效度。阈下和非典型症状在流行病学调查中值得关注。