Suppr超能文献

惊恐-场所恐惧症谱系:评估工具的信度和效度

Panic-agoraphobic spectrum: reliability and validity of assessment instruments.

作者信息

Shear M K, Frank E, Rucci P, Fagiolini D A, Grochocinski V J, Houck P, Cassano G B, Kupfer D J, Endicott J, Maser J D, Mauri M, Banti S

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, 3811 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2001 Jan-Feb;35(1):59-66. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(01)00002-4.

Abstract

DSM IV is a simple, reliable diagnostic system with many advantages. However, DSM diagnostic criteria may not provide sufficient characterization of clinically significant symptoms. We have undertaken a project to assess an array (spectrum) of clinical features associated with different DSM Disorders. The purpose of this paper is to report on reliability of assessment instruments for Panic-Agoraphobic Spectrum (PAS), to document convergent validity of PAS symptom groupings, and to confirm the relationship between PAS and DSM IV Panic Disorder (PD). We studied 22 normal controls and 95 outpatients who met criteria for Panic Disorder with and without lifetime Major Depression, and Major Depression or Obsessive Compulsive Disorder without lifetime Panic Disorder. Assessment instruments had excellent reliability and there was good concordance between interview and self-report formats. PAS scores were highest in subjects with PD, followed by outpatients without PD, and were lowest in normal controls. PAS scores varied among PD patients, and a subgroup of patients without PD scored high on PAS. We conclude that PAS can be reliably assessed, and that it describes a valid, coherent constellation of features associated with DSM IV Panic Disorder, but providing additional important clinical information.

摘要

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM IV)是一个简单、可靠的诊断系统,具有诸多优点。然而,DSM的诊断标准可能无法充分描述具有临床意义的症状。我们开展了一个项目,以评估与不同DSM疾病相关的一系列临床特征。本文的目的是报告惊恐-广场恐怖谱系(PAS)评估工具的可靠性,记录PAS症状分组的聚合效度,并确认PAS与DSM IV惊恐障碍(PD)之间的关系。我们研究了22名正常对照者和95名门诊患者,这些门诊患者符合伴有或不伴有终生重度抑郁症的惊恐障碍标准,以及患有重度抑郁症或强迫症但无终生惊恐障碍的患者。评估工具具有出色的可靠性,访谈和自我报告形式之间具有良好的一致性。PAS得分在患有PD的受试者中最高,其次是没有PD的门诊患者,在正常对照者中最低。PAS得分在PD患者中有所不同,并且一组没有PD的患者在PAS上得分较高。我们得出结论,PAS可以得到可靠的评估,并且它描述了与DSM IV惊恐障碍相关的一组有效、连贯的特征,同时还提供了额外的重要临床信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验