Aprea C, Sciarra G, Lunghini L, Centi L, Ceccarelli F
Department of Occupational Toxicology and Industrial Hygiene, Siena, Italy.
AIHAJ. 2001 Jan-Feb;62(1):87-95. doi: 10.1080/15298660108984614.
This research evaluated exposure pathways across work tasks for three organophosphate pesticides in a group of greenhouse workers. During reentry in ornamental plant greenhouses, five male workers were monitored for five consecutive days. Skin contamination (excluding hands) was evaluated with nine pads of filter paper placed on the skin. Hand contamination was assessed by washing with 95% ethanol. Respiratory exposure was evaluated by personal air sampling. The respiratory dose was based on a lung ventilation of 20 L/min. The doses absorbed were estimated assuming 10% skin penetration and 100% lung retention. Urinary alkylphosphates were assayed in the 24-hour urine samples of the days on which exposure was evaluated. Respiratory exposure was usually less than skin contamination, being 4.5 +/- 8.4%, 9.9 +/- 10.0%, and 49.5 +/- 26.6% (mean +/- standard deviation) of total exposure for omethoate, tolclofos-methyl, and fenitrothion, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that urinary alkylphosphate (nmol/24 hours) (y) was significantly correlated (r = 0.716, p < 0.001) with the respiratory doses of the three active ingredients absorbed the same day (x1) and with the cutaneous dose absorbed the previous day (x2). The relationship was expressed by the equation y = 0.592x2 + 0.117x, + 156.364. The doses of omethoate absorbed by one worker were more than 45 times the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 1.41 nmol/kg body weight (b.w.) The ADI for fenitrothion and tolclofos-methyl (10.8 and 212.6 nmol/kg body weight, respectively) were never exceeded. High absorption by one worker underlines the importance of correct use of protective clothing. In this study the hands were always a source of contact with the pesticides. Greater precautions should be taken to reduce contamination (clean gloves, constant use of gloves).
本研究评估了一组温室工人在各项工作任务中接触三种有机磷农药的途径。在观赏性植物温室重新进入期间,对五名男性工人连续五天进行了监测。使用九片滤纸贴于皮肤上评估皮肤污染(不包括手部)。通过用95%乙醇洗手来评估手部污染。通过个人空气采样评估呼吸道暴露情况。呼吸剂量基于20升/分钟的肺通气量。假设皮肤渗透率为10%且肺部滞留率为100%,估算吸收剂量。在评估暴露的日子里,对24小时尿液样本中的尿烷基磷酸盐进行检测。呼吸道暴露通常低于皮肤污染,分别占氧化乐果、甲基立枯磷和杀螟硫磷总暴露量的4.5±8.4%、9.9±"
10.0%和49.5±26.6%(平均值±标准差)。多元回归分析表明,尿烷基磷酸盐(纳摩尔/24小时)(y)与当天吸收的三种活性成分的呼吸剂量(x1)以及前一天吸收的皮肤剂量(x2)显著相关(r = 0.716,p < 0.001)。该关系由方程y = 0.592x2 + 0.117x1 + 156.364表示。一名工人吸收的氧化乐果剂量超过了1.41纳摩尔/千克体重的每日允许摄入量(ADI)的45倍以上。杀螟硫磷和甲基立枯磷的ADI(分别为10.8和212.6纳摩尔/千克体重)从未被超过。一名工人的高吸收量凸显了正确使用防护服的重要性。在本研究中,手部始终是接触农药的源头。应采取更多预防措施以减少污染(清洁手套、持续佩戴手套)。