Olson A D, Shope T C, Flynn J T
Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
Pediatr Transplant. 2001 Feb;5(1):44-50. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3046.2001.00032.x.
Because of the severe complications that may result from varicella zoster virus (VZV) infection following renal transplantation (Tx), transplanted varicella-susceptible children exposed to varicella are typically given varicella zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG) as prophylaxis or are admitted and treated with parenteral acyclovir if VZIG prophylaxis fails. As both VZIG and hospitalization are costly, prevention of varicella infection by vaccination could potentially result in significant cost savings in addition to decreasing morbidity and mortality. To test this hypothesis, we developed a decision-analysis model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccinating patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) against varicella prior to renal transplant. Under baseline assumptions, vaccination for varicella pretransplant was a cost-effective strategy, with a cost of $211 per patient vaccinated compared with $1,828 per patient not vaccinated. The magnitude of cost savings from vaccination was sensitive to variations in the cost of varicella vaccine, the percentage of patients hospitalized for treatment with acyclovir, and the percentage of patients exposed to varicella infection. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses confirmed that vaccination was the dominant cost-effective strategy under all conditions examined. We conclude that vaccination for varicella pretransplant is cost-effective for patients with CRF, and that the magnitude of cost savings is sensitive to the cost of hospitalization, the percentage of patients exposed to varicella, and the cost of varicella vaccination. Pending results of ongoing studies of the safety and efficacy of VZV vaccine in children with CRF, we recommend that VZV vaccine be given to all children with CRF.
由于肾移植(Tx)后水痘带状疱疹病毒(VZV)感染可能导致严重并发症,暴露于水痘的移植后易患水痘的儿童通常会接受水痘带状疱疹免疫球蛋白(VZIG)作为预防措施,或者如果VZIG预防失败,则入院并用静脉注射阿昔洛韦进行治疗。由于VZIG和住院治疗费用都很高,通过接种疫苗预防水痘感染除了可以降低发病率和死亡率外,还可能显著节省成本。为了验证这一假设,我们开发了一个决策分析模型,以评估对慢性肾衰竭(CRF)患者在肾移植前接种水痘疫苗的成本效益。在基线假设下,移植前接种水痘疫苗是一种具有成本效益的策略,每位接种疫苗的患者成本为211美元,而未接种疫苗的患者成本为1828美元。接种疫苗节省的成本幅度对水痘疫苗成本、因阿昔洛韦治疗而住院的患者百分比以及暴露于水痘感染的患者百分比的变化敏感。单向和双向敏感性分析证实,在所有检查条件下,接种疫苗都是主要的成本效益策略。我们得出结论,移植前接种水痘疫苗对CRF患者具有成本效益,节省成本的幅度对住院成本、暴露于水痘的患者百分比以及水痘疫苗接种成本敏感。在CRF儿童中进行的VZV疫苗安全性和有效性的正在进行的研究结果出来之前,我们建议对所有CRF儿童接种VZV疫苗。