Song C W, Park H, Griffin R J
Department of Therapeutic Radiology-Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware Street SE, MMC 494, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Radiat Res. 2001 Apr;155(4):515-28. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)155[0515:iotobm]2.0.co;2.
There is now abundant evidence that oxygenation in rodent, canine and human tumors is improved during and for up to 1-2 days after heating at mild temperatures. An increase in tumor blood perfusion along with a decline in the oxygen consumption rate appears to account for the improvement of tumor oxygenation by mild hyperthermia. The magnitude of the increase in tumor pO(2), determined with oxygen-sensitive microelectrodes, caused by mild hyperthermia is less than that caused by carbogen breathing. However, mild hyperthermia is far more effective than carbogen breathing in increasing the radiation response of experimental tumors, probably because mild hyperthermia oxygenates both (diffusion-limited) chronically hypoxic and (perfusion-limited) acutely hypoxic cells, whereas carbogen breathing oxygenates only the chronically hypoxic cells. Mild hyperthermia is also more effective than nicotinamide, which is known to oxygenate acutely hypoxic cells, in enhancing the radiation response of experimental tumors. The combination of mild hyperthermia with carbogen or nicotinamide is highly effective in reducing the hypoxic cell fraction in tumors and increasing the radiation response of experimental tumors. A primary rationale for the use of hyperthermia in combination with radiotherapy has been that hyperthermia is equally cytotoxic toward fully oxygenated and hypoxic cells and that it directly sensitizes both fully oxygenated and hypoxic cells to radiation. Such cytotoxicity and such a radiosensitizing effect may be expected to be significant when the tumor temperature is elevated to at least 42-43 degrees C. Unfortunately, it is often impossible to uniformly raise the temperature of human tumors to this level using the hyperthermia devices currently available. However, it is relatively easy to raise the temperature of human tumors into the range of 39-42 degrees C, which is a temperature that can improve tumor oxygenation for up to 1-2 days. The potential usefulness of mild hyperthermia to enhance the response of human tumors to radiotherapy by improving tumor oxygenation merits continued investigation.
现在有大量证据表明,在啮齿动物、犬类和人类肿瘤中,在温和温度加热期间及之后长达1 - 2天内,肿瘤的氧合作用会得到改善。肿瘤血流灌注增加以及氧消耗率下降似乎是温和热疗改善肿瘤氧合的原因。用氧敏感微电极测定,温和热疗引起的肿瘤pO₂增加幅度小于卡波金呼吸引起的幅度。然而,在增加实验性肿瘤的放射反应方面,温和热疗远比卡波金呼吸有效,这可能是因为温和热疗能使(扩散受限的)慢性缺氧细胞和(灌注受限的)急性缺氧细胞都得到氧合,而卡波金呼吸只能使慢性缺氧细胞得到氧合。在增强实验性肿瘤的放射反应方面,温和热疗也比已知能使急性缺氧细胞得到氧合的烟酰胺更有效。温和热疗与卡波金或烟酰胺联合使用在降低肿瘤中的缺氧细胞比例和增加实验性肿瘤的放射反应方面非常有效。热疗与放疗联合使用的一个主要理论依据是,热疗对完全氧合和缺氧细胞具有同等的细胞毒性,并且它能直接使完全氧合和缺氧细胞对辐射敏感。当肿瘤温度升高到至少42 - 43摄氏度时,这种细胞毒性和放射增敏作用可能会很显著。不幸的是,使用目前可用的热疗设备通常不可能将人类肿瘤的温度均匀地提高到这个水平。然而,将人类肿瘤的温度提高到39 - 42摄氏度的范围相对容易,这个温度可以改善肿瘤氧合长达1 - 2天。温和热疗通过改善肿瘤氧合来增强人类肿瘤对放疗反应的潜在效用值得继续研究。