• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种具有内部连接的牙种植系统种植体-基台连接处的体外细菌渗漏情况

In Vitro Bacterial Leakage at the Implant-Abutment Connection of Two Dental Implant Systems with Internal Connection.

作者信息

Khajavi Azadeh, Mohseni Shabnam, Peymani Amir, Amjadi Mehrak

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

出版信息

Front Dent. 2020 Dec 8;17:32. doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i32.5196. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.18502/fid.v17i32.5196
PMID:36042810
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9375122/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Bacterial leakage at the implant-abutment interface is one of the main causes of peri-implant inflammation. One of the factors that influences bacterial leakage is the structural design of the interface. Considering the limited studies that have examined slip-joint connections, a comparative study of bacterial leakage was performed on two different systems namely Zimmer (Tapered Screw-Vent, Zimmer Dental) with slip-joint connection and Argon (Konus K3pro, Argon Implants) with conical connection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two implants were selected in 2 groups (11 Zimmer with slip-joint connection, and 11 Argon with conical connection) with similar platforms. Escherichia coli (E. coli) suspension (2 μL) was pipetted into the internal lumen of implants. The abutments were screwed onto the implants with a closing torque of 30 Ncm. The assemblies were placed in culture broth for 6, 24, 48 and 72 h, and 7 and 14 days. The colonies were counted and analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test (a=0.05).

RESULTS

Microleakage was observed in 20% of the samples of conical connection group after 6 h to 2 days, and in 50% of the samples in slip-joint connection group after 3 to 7 days. There was a significant difference in bacterial leakage rate between the two implant groups (P<0.001) but no significant difference was seen in bacterial leakage over time (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Type of connection had a significant effect on bacterial leakage, but the rate of bacterial leakage did not significantly change over time.

摘要

目的

种植体-基台界面处的细菌渗漏是种植体周围炎的主要原因之一。影响细菌渗漏的因素之一是界面的结构设计。鉴于对滑动连接的研究有限,对两种不同系统进行了细菌渗漏的对比研究,即采用滑动连接的zimmer(锥形螺纹排气式,zimmer牙科)系统和采用锥形连接的氩气(Konus K3pro,氩气种植体)系统。

材料与方法

选择2组共22颗种植体(11颗采用滑动连接的zimmer种植体和11颗采用锥形连接的氩气种植体),平台相似。将大肠杆菌(E. coli)悬液(2μL)用移液器注入种植体的内部管腔。以30Ncm的拧紧扭矩将基台拧到种植体上。将组件置于培养液中6、24、48和72小时,以及7天和14天。通过Mann-Whitney检验(α=0.05)对菌落进行计数和分析。

结果

锥形连接组20%的样本在6小时至2天出现微渗漏,滑动连接组50%的样本在3至7天出现微渗漏。两组种植体的细菌渗漏率存在显著差异(P<0.001),但细菌渗漏随时间无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

连接类型对细菌渗漏有显著影响,但细菌渗漏率随时间无显著变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/cdc6e5941025/FID-17-32-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/96d6d50b220f/FID-17-32-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/866743737b82/FID-17-32-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/e8d91aed23f0/FID-17-32-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/cdc6e5941025/FID-17-32-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/96d6d50b220f/FID-17-32-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/866743737b82/FID-17-32-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/e8d91aed23f0/FID-17-32-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/292e/9375122/cdc6e5941025/FID-17-32-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
In Vitro Bacterial Leakage at the Implant-Abutment Connection of Two Dental Implant Systems with Internal Connection.两种具有内部连接的牙种植系统种植体-基台连接处的体外细菌渗漏情况
Front Dent. 2020 Dec 8;17:32. doi: 10.18502/fid.v17i32.5196. eCollection 2020.
2
The effect of dynamic loading on bacterial microleakage of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface: An study.动态负载对牙种植体-基台界面细菌微渗漏的影响:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Oct-Dec;21(4):420-424. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_96_21.
3
In Vitro Comparison of Microbial Leakage of the Implant-Healing Abutment Interface in Four Connection Systems.四种连接系统中种植体-愈合基台界面微生物渗漏的体外比较
J Oral Implantol. 2019 Oct;45(5):350-355. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00311. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
5
Evaluation of resistance against bacterial microleakage of a new conical implant-abutment connection versus conventional connections: an in vitro study.新型锥形种植体-基台连接与传统连接方式的细菌微渗漏抗性评估:一项体外研究。
New Microbiol. 2016 Jan;39(1):49-56.
6
Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface of conical connection with an internal octagon: an in vitro study using real-time PCR.种植体-基台界面锥形连接内八角细菌定植的体外研究:实时聚合酶链反应。
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2017 Apr-Jun;31(2 Suppl 1):163-168.
7
Effects of Taper Angle and Sealant Agents on Bacterial Leakage Along the Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study Under Loaded Conditions.锥角和封闭剂对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响:负载条件下的体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 September/October;33(5):1071–1077. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6257. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
8
Bacterial leakage in implants with different implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study.不同种植体-基台连接体的细菌渗漏:一项体外研究。
J Periodontol. 2012 Apr;83(4):491-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110320. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
9
Bacterial Microleakage at the Implant-Healing Abutment Interface in Two Different Implant Designs: Platform Switching versus Platform Matching.两种不同种植体设计中种植体-愈合基台界面的细菌微渗漏:平台转换与平台匹配。
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2021;31(1):33-42. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2021036957.
10
Association Between Implant-Abutment Microgap and Implant Circularity to Bacterial Leakage: An In Vitro Study Using Tapered Connection Implants.种植体-基台微间隙与种植体圆度对细菌渗漏的相关性:一项使用锥形连接种植体的体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/June;33(3):505–511. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5836. Epub 2017 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Microgap Size and Microbial Microleakage at the Implant Fixture-Abutment Interface in Original and Compatible Abutments.种植体基台与原配基台和适配基台界面处微间隙大小及微生物微渗漏的评估。
Biomed Res Int. 2025 Jul 9;2025:2530986. doi: 10.1155/bmri/2530986. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of Microgap and Bacterial Leakage of Two Types of Internal Implant-Abutment Union.两种类型的种植体-基台连接的微间隙和细菌渗漏评估。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S792-S793. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1012_23. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
3
The effect of dynamic loading on bacterial microleakage of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface: An study.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro assessment of connection strength and stability of internal implant-abutment connections.种植体内种植体-基台连接的连接强度和稳定性的体外评估。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 May;65:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
2
Association Between Implant-Abutment Microgap and Implant Circularity to Bacterial Leakage: An In Vitro Study Using Tapered Connection Implants.种植体-基台微间隙与种植体圆度对细菌渗漏的相关性:一项使用锥形连接种植体的体外研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/June;33(3):505–511. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5836. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
3
Leakage of Microbial Endotoxin through the Implant-Abutment Interface in Oral Implants: An In Vitro Study.
动态负载对牙种植体-基台界面细菌微渗漏的影响:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Oct-Dec;21(4):420-424. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_96_21.
口腔种植体中微生物内毒素通过种植体-基台界面的渗漏:一项体外研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:9219071. doi: 10.1155/2016/9219071. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
4
A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a passive and friction fit implant abutment interface and the influence of occlusal table dimension on the stress distribution pattern on the implant and surrounding bone.被动和摩擦配合种植体基台界面的三维有限元分析以及咬合面尺寸对种植体和周围骨应力分布模式的影响。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2015 Jul-Sep;15(3):229-36. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.161559.
5
Evaluation of resistance against bacterial microleakage of a new conical implant-abutment connection versus conventional connections: an in vitro study.新型锥形种植体-基台连接与传统连接方式的细菌微渗漏抗性评估:一项体外研究。
New Microbiol. 2016 Jan;39(1):49-56.
6
Parameters determining micromotion at the implant-abutment interface.决定种植体-基台界面微动的参数。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):1338-47. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3762.
7
Bacterial Composition at the Implant-Abutment Connection under Loading in vivo.体内加载条件下种植体-基台连接处的细菌组成
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):138-45. doi: 10.1111/cid.12270. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
8
Bacterial contamination along implant-abutment interface in external and internal-hex dental implants.外六边和内六边牙科种植体中种植体-基台界面的细菌污染
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Mar 15;7(3):580-5. eCollection 2014.
9
Microleakage of the prosthetic abutment/implant interface with internal and external connection: in vitro study.具有内连接和外连接的修复基台/种植体界面的微渗漏:体外研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Sep;25(9):1078-83. doi: 10.1111/clr.12217. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
10
Performance of conical abutment (Morse Taper) connection implants: a systematic review.锥形基台(莫尔斯锥度)连接种植体的性能:系统评价。
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014 Feb;102(2):552-74. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34709. Epub 2013 May 9.