• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心电图在疑似急性心肌梗死合并左束支传导阻滞中的价值。

Value of the ECG in suspected acute myocardial infarction with left bundle branch block.

作者信息

Sgarbossa E B

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Rush-Presbyterian Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2000;33 Suppl:87-92. doi: 10.1054/jelc.2000.20324.

DOI:10.1054/jelc.2000.20324
PMID:11265742
Abstract

Uncomplicated left bundle branch block (LBBB) is characterized by true ST-segment shifts resulting from delayed repolarization in the left ventricle with respect to the right ventricle. When acute coronary occlusions develop in the setting of previous or new LBBB, 12-lead eCG manifestations of injury may also appear. They consist of a more pronounced ST-segment elevation, of ST-segment deviations opposite to those of uncomplicated LBBB, or both. We have reported that the only 3 independent ECG signs of acute MI during LBBB among patients with chest pain or history of coronary disease are: ST elevation > or = 1 mm in leads with a positive QRS, ST-depression > or = 1 mm in V1 to V3, and ST elevation > or = 5 mm in leads with a negative QRS. In our study, the clinical prediction rule score values of these signs were 5; 3; and 2, respectively. A score > or = 3 made a diagnosis of MI with a 90% specificity and a score of 2 with > 80%, specificity. Recent validation studies have confirmed that the presence of any of these ECG signs is associated with a sensitivity of 44 to 79% and a specificity of 93 to 100%. Sensitivity increases if serial or previous ECGs are available for comparison. Interobserver agreement is very high. While current practice guidelines recommend thrombolysis for all patients with chest pain and LBBB, concern among physicians about hemorrhagic stroke prevents many of these patients from receiving timely treatment. In a population with LBBB and chest pain where our proposed ECG criteria were not ascertained, only 73% of eligible patients received thrombolysis; on the other hand, 48% of patients with no biochemical evidence of MI were thrombolyzed. For the latter group, the clinical prediction rule had a score of 0. Instead, 79% of patients with confirmed acute MI had a prediction rule score > or =2. Similar values applied to a subgroup of patients with serial ECGs. We propose that thrombolysis among patients with chest pain and LBBB be decided on the basis of a systematic ECG review to "rule patients in". This provision may result in both a significant reduction in the number of patients without infarction who receive thrombolysis and in timely treatment of those who do have MI.

摘要

单纯性左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的特征是,相对于右心室,左心室复极延迟导致真正的ST段移位。当在既往或新发LBBB的情况下发生急性冠状动脉闭塞时,12导联心电图(ECG)也可能出现损伤表现。这些表现包括更明显的ST段抬高、与单纯性LBBB相反的ST段偏移,或两者皆有。我们曾报道,在胸痛或有冠心病病史的患者中,LBBB期间急性心肌梗死(MI)仅有的3个独立心电图征象为:QRS波正向的导联中ST段抬高≥1mm、V1至V3导联中ST段压低≥1mm以及QRS波负向的导联中ST段抬高≥5mm。在我们的研究中,这些征象的临床预测规则评分值分别为5、3和2。评分≥3对MI的诊断特异性为90%,评分为2时特异性>80%。近期的验证研究证实,这些心电图征象中的任何一项出现时,敏感性为44%至79%,特异性为93%至100%。如果有系列或既往心电图可供比较,敏感性会增加。观察者间的一致性非常高。虽然目前的实践指南建议对所有胸痛和LBBB患者进行溶栓治疗,但医生对出血性卒中的担忧使许多此类患者无法得到及时治疗。在一个未确定我们提出的心电图标准的LBBB和胸痛人群中,只有73%的符合条件的患者接受了溶栓治疗;另一方面,48%没有MI生化证据的患者接受了溶栓治疗。对于后一组患者而言,临床预测规则评分为0。相反,79%确诊为急性MI的患者预测规则评分≥2。类似的值适用于有系列心电图的患者亚组。我们建议,胸痛和LBBB患者的溶栓治疗应基于系统的心电图检查来决定,以“确诊患者”。这一措施可能会显著减少接受溶栓治疗但无梗死的患者数量,并使确实患有MI的患者得到及时治疗。

相似文献

1
Value of the ECG in suspected acute myocardial infarction with left bundle branch block.心电图在疑似急性心肌梗死合并左束支传导阻滞中的价值。
J Electrocardiol. 2000;33 Suppl:87-92. doi: 10.1054/jelc.2000.20324.
2
[The importance of left bundle branch block in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction].[左束支传导阻滞在急性心肌梗死诊断中的重要性]
Medicina (Kaunas). 2003;39(1):15-20.
3
Suspected myocardial infarction and left bundle branch block: electrocardiographic indicators of acute ischaemia.疑似心肌梗死与左束支传导阻滞:急性缺血的心电图指标
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;16(5):331-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.5.331.
4
ECG diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block in patients undergoing continuous ECG monitoring.在接受连续心电图监测的患者中,存在左束支传导阻滞时急性心肌梗死的心电图诊断。
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Jul;26(1):69-82. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70241-5.
5
A critique of the new ST-segment criteria for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle-branch block.对左束支传导阻滞患者急性心肌梗死诊断中新ST段标准的批判。
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Oct;24(10):652-5. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960241004.
6
Utility of the prehospital electrocardiogram in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes: the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project.院前心电图在诊断急性冠脉综合征中的应用:心肌梗死分诊与干预(MITI)项目
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jul;32(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00175-2.
7
New ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction criteria for left bundle branch block based on QRS area.基于QRS面积的左束支传导阻滞新的ST段抬高型心肌梗死标准。
J Electrocardiol. 2013 Nov-Dec;46(6):528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
8
Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block.左束支传导阻滞患者心肌梗死的心电图诊断
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):561-5. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.108079.
9
Diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle branch block with the ST-elevation to S-wave ratio in a modified Sgarbossa rule.应用改良 Sgarbossa 规则中 ST 段抬高与 S 波比值诊断左束支传导阻滞伴 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):766-76. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.07.119. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
10
Diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block.诊断左束支传导阻滞患者的急性心肌梗死。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Sep 15;108(6):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of prealbumin with short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者前白蛋白与短期和长期预后的关联
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Apr 28;21(4):421-430. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.04.003.
2
The Relationship of Conduction Disorder and Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.传导障碍与急性冠状动脉综合征患者预后的关系。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Oct 22;2022:9676434. doi: 10.1155/2022/9676434. eCollection 2022.
3
Diagnosis of myocardial infarction and ischemia in the setting of bundle branch block and cardiac pacing.
束支传导阻滞和心脏起搏情况下心肌梗死与心肌缺血的诊断
Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2016 Sep;27(3):307-22. doi: 10.1007/s00399-016-0439-1.
4
Myocardial ischaemia and left bundle branch block.心肌缺血和左束支传导阻滞。
Neth Heart J. 2003 Sep;11(9):362-363.
5
ST-segment elevation: Distinguishing ST elevation myocardial infarction from ST elevation secondary to nonischemic etiologies.ST段抬高:鉴别ST段抬高型心肌梗死与继发于非缺血性病因的ST段抬高。
World J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 26;6(10):1067-79. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v6.i10.1067.
6
LBBB masking the ECG changes of inferior wall infarction: a caution to be vigilant.左束支传导阻滞掩盖下壁心肌梗死的心电图变化:需警惕的警示
BMJ Case Rep. 2014 May 30;2014:bcr2014205095. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2014-205095.
7
ST elevation: telling pathology from the benign patterns.ST段抬高:从良性模式中辨别病理情况。
Glob J Health Sci. 2012 Apr 28;4(3):51-63. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n3p51.
8
Evolving considerations in the management of patients with left bundle branch block and suspected myocardial infarction.左束支传导阻滞伴疑似心肌梗死患者管理中不断变化的考虑因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 10;60(2):96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.054.
9
Assessment of acute myocardial infarction: current status and recommendations from the North American society for Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology.急性心肌梗死评估:北美心血管成像学会和欧洲心脏病学会的现状和建议。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jan;27(1):7-24. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9714-0. Epub 2010 Oct 24.
10
Comparison of the electrocardiographic features of complete left bundle branch block in patients with ischemic and nonischemic left ventricular dysfunction.缺血性和非缺血性左心室功能障碍患者完全性左束支传导阻滞的心电图特征比较。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2007 Jan 1;7(1):26-32.