Suppr超能文献

研究者与被研究者——社区视角:努力弥合差距

Researcher and researched--community perspectives: toward bridging the gap.

作者信息

Sullivan M, Kone A, Senturia K D, Chrisman N J, Ciske S J, Krieger J W

机构信息

Seattle-King County Department of Public Health, Seattle Partners for Healthy Communities, Washington 98103, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2001 Apr;28(2):130-49. doi: 10.1177/109019810102800202.

Abstract

In the process of initiating a new community-based research project, the authors wanted to understand the experiences of community members and researchers in community-based research projects and to develop guidelines to improve future projects. They conducted qualitative, key informant interviews with 41 people involved at all levels of community-based research projects in Seattle. Respondents were identified using a snowball sampling technique. More problems than successes were discussed by informants, including dissatisfaction with the focus of research, which some said is marked by a lack of cultural appropriateness and relevance. Power imbalances, lack of trust, and communication difficulties impeded collaboration. According to respondents, many problems could be avoided if the community were involved from the beginning in setting research priorities and developing and implementing interventions. Meaningful collaboration between communities and researchers is characterized by early involvement of communities, power sharing, mutual respect, community benefit, and cultural sensitivity.

摘要

在启动一个新的基于社区的研究项目过程中,作者希望了解社区成员和研究人员在基于社区的研究项目中的经历,并制定指导方针以改进未来的项目。他们对西雅图参与基于社区的研究项目各个层面的41人进行了定性的关键信息人访谈。受访者通过滚雪球抽样技术确定。信息提供者讨论的问题多于成功之处,包括对研究重点的不满,一些人表示研究重点缺乏文化适宜性和相关性。权力失衡、缺乏信任和沟通困难阻碍了合作。据受访者称,如果社区从一开始就参与确定研究重点以及制定和实施干预措施,许多问题是可以避免的。社区与研究人员之间有意义的合作的特点是社区的早期参与、权力共享、相互尊重、社区受益和文化敏感性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验