• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灰尘擦拭样品中铅的超声提取及现场便携式阳极溶出伏安法测定

Ultrasonic extraction and field-portable anodic stripping voltammetric measurement of lead in dust wipe samples.

作者信息

Ashley K, Wise T J, Mercado W, Parry D B

机构信息

US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.

出版信息

J Hazard Mater. 2001 May 7;83(1-2):41-50. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00326-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00326-5
PMID:11267744
Abstract

Dust wipe samples were subjected to ultrasonic extraction (UE) in diluted nitric acid, and then analyzed for lead content using field-portable anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV). Recoveries of lead were determined from wipe materials which were spiked with certified reference materials (CRMs) containing known quantities of lead. Four different wipe materials and four different CRMs were tested, with and without filtration of aliquots of sample extract through 0.45 microm hydrophilic polytetrafluoroethylene filters. The CRMs consisted of paint, soil, particulate, and dust matrices. Wipe materials were chosen from those which have been found to meet the performance aspects of an ASTM standard specification. UE/ASV experiments were carried out in accordance with newly published ASTM procedures for on-site extraction and electroanalysis. Recoveries were found to vary for different wipe materials and CRMs. For several CRMs, quantitative (80--120%) recoveries for UE/ASV were observed for one wipe material whether filtration was used or not, while other wipe materials required filtration for quantitative recovery. In the case of one wipe material which contained detergents, quantitative recoveries could not be achieved whether filtration was used or not. The total analysis time for a sample set of 6--12 samples was 60--90 min, including extraction time and sample manipulation. The results of this work have provided information on the choice of wipe materials that can be used for quantitative lead measurements by UE/ASV in materials that are representative of sources of lead in surface dust.

摘要

将灰尘擦拭样本置于稀硝酸中进行超声萃取(UE),然后使用现场便携式阳极溶出伏安法(ASV)分析铅含量。通过向含有已知铅含量的标准参考物质(CRM)的擦拭材料中加标来测定铅的回收率。测试了四种不同的擦拭材料和四种不同的CRM,样本提取物的等分试样有的经过0.45微米亲水性聚四氟乙烯滤膜过滤,有的未经过滤。CRM包括油漆、土壤、颗粒和灰尘基质。擦拭材料选自那些已被发现符合ASTM标准规范性能要求的材料。UE/ASV实验按照新发布的ASTM现场萃取和电分析程序进行。发现不同擦拭材料和CRM的回收率各不相同。对于几种CRM,一种擦拭材料无论是否使用过滤,UE/ASV的回收率均为定量(80%-120%),而其他擦拭材料则需要过滤才能实现定量回收。对于一种含有洗涤剂的擦拭材料,无论是否使用过滤都无法实现定量回收。一组6-12个样本的总分析时间为60-90分钟,包括萃取时间和样本处理时间。这项工作的结果提供了有关擦拭材料选择的信息,这些擦拭材料可用于通过UE/ASV对代表地表灰尘中铅源的材料进行铅的定量测量。

相似文献

1
Ultrasonic extraction and field-portable anodic stripping voltammetric measurement of lead in dust wipe samples.灰尘擦拭样品中铅的超声提取及现场便携式阳极溶出伏安法测定
J Hazard Mater. 2001 May 7;83(1-2):41-50. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(00)00326-5.
2
Ultrasonic extraction and portable anodic stripping voltammetric measurement of lead in paint, dust wipes, soil, and air: an interlaboratory evaluation.油漆、灰尘擦拭物、土壤和空气中铅的超声萃取及便携式阳极溶出伏安法测量:实验室间评估
J Environ Monit. 1999 Oct;1(5):459-64. doi: 10.1039/a903685g.
3
Field measurement of lead in workplace air and paint chip samples by ultrasonic extraction and portable anodic stripping voltammetry.通过超声萃取和便携式阳极溶出伏安法对工作场所空气中的铅和油漆碎片样本进行现场测量。
J Environ Monit. 2002 Feb;4(1):156-61. doi: 10.1039/b109070b.
4
Ultrasonic extraction and field-portable anodic stripping voltammetry for the determination of lead in workplace air samples.超声萃取与现场便携式阳极溶出伏安法测定工作场所空气样品中的铅
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Oct;59(10):671-9. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010848.
5
A comparison of methods and materials for the analysis of leaded wipes.含铅擦拭布分析方法与材料的比较
J Environ Monit. 2002 Dec;4(6):1025-33. doi: 10.1039/b208456m.
6
Evaluation of wipe sampling materials for lead in surface dust.用于表面灰尘中铅的擦拭采样材料评估
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1994 Apr;55(4):339-42. doi: 10.1080/15428119491018989.
7
The use of composite dust wipe samples as a means of assessing lead exposure.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1999 May-Jun;60(3):326-33. doi: 10.1080/00028899908984449.
8
A comparison of surface wipe media for sampling lead on hands.用于手部铅采样的表面擦拭介质比较。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2006 Aug;3(8):428-34. doi: 10.1080/15459620600802754.
9
A laboratory evaluation of wipe testing based on lead oxide surface contamination.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1984 May;45(5):311-7. doi: 10.1080/15298668491399848.
10
Laboratory and analytical method performance of lead measurements in paint chips, soils, and dusts.油漆碎片、土壤和灰尘中铅含量测量的实验室及分析方法性能
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1996 Nov;57(11):1035-43. doi: 10.1080/15428119691014378.