Lewis R, Gillam S
King's Fund, 11-13 Cavendish Square, London W1G 0AN, England.
Int J Health Serv. 2001;31(1):111-8. doi: 10.2190/G9K8-4EW0-VXPH-RRCB.
Less than three years after initiating a series of health service reforms, the Blair government has launched another plan for the U.K. National Health Service. This article considers the origins and contents of the plan. A major investment program is designed to bring health care spending up to European averages over the next five years. In return, the government seeks to challenge the existing settlement between organized medicine and the state through tighter regulatory control, altered contractual frameworks, and a new public-private concordat. The plan does not represent a radical change in government policy but rather reaffirms existing approaches to increasing access to health services, integrating health and social care, and empowering users. Notwithstanding arrangements to increase the autonomy of health service organizations, the plan increases central control through a range of new bodies and regulatory frameworks. It represents an incremental adjustment of the existing tax-funded system. Should this reinvigoration of the state monopoly fail, alternative sources of funding will no doubt have to be reconsidered.
在启动一系列医疗服务改革不到三年后,布莱尔政府又为英国国民医疗服务体系推出了另一项计划。本文探讨了该计划的起源和内容。一项重大投资计划旨在在未来五年内将医疗保健支出提高到欧洲平均水平。作为回报,政府试图通过更严格的监管控制、改变合同框架以及新的公私协约,来挑战有组织的医疗界与政府之间现有的协议。该计划并非政府政策的根本性转变,而是重申了现有的增加医疗服务可及性、整合医疗与社会护理以及赋予用户权力的方法。尽管有增加医疗服务机构自主权的安排,但该计划通过一系列新机构和监管框架加强了中央控制。它代表了对现有的税收资助体系的渐进式调整。如果这种国家垄断的振兴失败,无疑将不得不重新考虑其他资金来源。