Suppr超能文献

准备、术前用药及监测。

Preparation, premedication, and surveillance.

作者信息

Lazzaroni M, Bianchi Porro G

机构信息

Dept. of Gastroenterology, L. Saccco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2001 Feb;33(2):103-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-11665.

Abstract

The endoscopic literature published during the past year has once again confirmed that there is significant variation from country to country regarding whether or not patients wish to receive conscious sedation during endoscopy (and particularly colonoscopy) - and there may even be variation from one endoscopic unit to another within the same country. Particular attention has been given to attempts to identify "ideal" candidates for conscious sedation, and to the importance of providing patients with information before the procedure. It has been shown that patients who receive detailed information about a medical procedure beforehand are able to benefit from this. The role of benzodiazepines, particularly midazolam, was investigated in studies emphasizing that the dosage should be kept to the minimum that is compatible with patient comfort and successful performance of the procedure. There have been few publications comparing propofol with midazolam. As expected, in view of the known pharmacological properties of the two drugs, the quality of sedation was better and the recovery time was shorter in patients who were treated with propofol. However, important questions are still open regarding the narrow therapeutic range of propofol and the methods by which it is administered (by endoscopists or by anesthesiologists). An important aspect of sedation procedures is the prevention of hypoxia and cardiopulmonary complications. Recent endoscopic reports have added little further information concerning the well-known risk of oxygen desaturation during conscious sedation. Performing endoscopy in unsedated patients reduces, but does not eliminate, the risk of hypoxia. Among the various risk factors, it has been found that chronic respiratory failure and coronary heart disease are factors predictive of severe desaturation and relevant electrocardiographic changes. The use of electronic monitoring techniques with pulse oximetry is recommended as a standard procedure during digestive endoscopy; however, it has been observed that when supplemental oxygen is administered, pulse oximetry no longer reflects normal ventilatory function and does not detect episodes of severe CO2 retention. Transcutaneous measurement of PCO2 therefore seems more reliable as a means of assessing hypoventilation. Several papers have proposed "ideal formulas" for bowel preparation for endoscopic procedures. Various regimens have been proposed as alternatives to polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) and sodium phosphate compounds, with different results. On the whole, there is still little information regarding the best and most cost-effective method of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy.

摘要

过去一年发表的内镜文献再次证实,在患者是否希望在内镜检查(尤其是结肠镜检查)期间接受清醒镇静方面,国与国之间存在显著差异,甚至在同一个国家内,不同的内镜科室之间也可能存在差异。人们特别关注确定清醒镇静“理想”候选人的尝试,以及在检查前向患者提供信息的重要性。研究表明,事先收到有关医疗程序详细信息的患者能够从中受益。在强调剂量应保持在与患者舒适度和检查顺利进行相适应的最低水平的研究中,对苯二氮䓬类药物,尤其是咪达唑仑的作用进行了调查。比较丙泊酚和咪达唑仑的出版物很少。正如预期的那样,鉴于这两种药物已知的药理特性,接受丙泊酚治疗的患者镇静质量更好,恢复时间更短。然而,关于丙泊酚狭窄的治疗范围及其给药方法(由内镜医师还是麻醉医师给药),重要问题仍然悬而未决。镇静程序的一个重要方面是预防缺氧和心肺并发症。最近的内镜报告几乎没有提供关于清醒镇静期间众所周知的氧饱和度降低风险的更多信息。在未镇静的患者中进行内镜检查可降低但不能消除缺氧风险。在各种风险因素中,已发现慢性呼吸衰竭和冠心病是严重氧饱和度降低及相关心电图变化的预测因素。建议在消化内镜检查期间使用脉搏血氧饱和度电子监测技术作为标准程序;然而,有人观察到,当给予补充氧气时,脉搏血氧饱和度不再反映正常通气功能,也无法检测到严重二氧化碳潴留发作。因此,经皮测量PCO2似乎是评估通气不足更可靠的方法。有几篇论文提出了内镜检查肠道准备的“理想方案”。已经提出了各种方案作为聚乙二醇电解质灌洗液(PEG-ELS)和磷酸钠化合物的替代方案,结果各不相同。总体而言,关于结肠镜检查和乙状结肠镜检查最佳且最具成本效益的肠道清洁方法,仍然知之甚少。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验