Brydensholt H H
Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Danish Research Agency, Randersgade 60, DK 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):11-24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0018-y.
The author, a High Court Judge, has chaired the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty (DCSD) since its establishment in 1992. The Committee has worked in the health sector, but from 1999 the scope has been broadened to cover all fields of science. The article describes how the work is organised and the experiences gained. It is stressed, that the difficulty in connection with scientific dishonesty is, first and foremost, to organise a system suitable for investigating cases effectively, professionally, and with proper respect to the fundamental legal rights of the parties involved. The Committee has also spent much effort in determining what can be termed scientific dishonesty and what falls outside this category but which may, nevertheless, be characterised as breaching of good scientific practice. It is emphasised that these rules are not arbitrarily established by the Committee, but formulated in accordance with norms general accepted by opinion leaders in the scientific community.
作者是一名高等法院法官,自1992年丹麦科学不端行为委员会(DCSD)成立以来一直担任该委员会主席。该委员会一直致力于卫生领域的工作,但自1999年起,其工作范围已扩大到涵盖所有科学领域。本文描述了该委员会的工作组织方式以及所获得的经验。文中强调,与科学不端行为相关的困难首先在于建立一个系统,以便能够有效、专业地调查案件,并适当尊重涉案各方的基本法律权利。该委员会还花费了大量精力来确定什么可被称为科学不端行为,以及哪些不属于这一范畴但仍可被视为违反良好科学实践的行为。需要强调的是,这些规则并非委员会随意制定,而是根据科学界意见领袖普遍接受的规范制定的。