Andersen D
Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty, Danish Research Agency, Randersgade 60, DL-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):25-34. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0019-x.
In 1992, The Danish Medical Research Council established a national committee on scientific dishonesty with the twofold task of handling cases of scientific misconduct and taking preventive initiatives. Scientific dishonesty was proven in only five cases, but in another nine cases lesser degrees of deviations from good scientific practice were found. The experiences from a total of 24 treated cases indicated that three key areas were at the basis of most of the accusations and the deviations from good practice: uncertainty about 1) authorship, about 2) rights and duties to use scientific data and about 3) agreements at the initiation of joint studies. As a consequence guidelines on good practice have been issued on these key subjects.
1992年，丹麦医学研究理事会成立了一个科学不端行为全国委员会，其双重任务是处理科学不端行为案件并采取预防措施。仅在五起案件中证实存在科学不端行为，但在另外九起案件中发现存在程度较轻的偏离良好科学实践的情况。总共24起已处理案件的经验表明，大多数指控和偏离良好实践的行为基于三个关键领域：一是关于1）作者身份，二是关于2）使用科学数据的权利和义务，三是关于3）联合研究启动时的协议。因此，已就这些关键主题发布了良好实践指南。
