Suppr超能文献

科学不端行为:丹麦关于评估与预防的提议。

Scientific dishonesty: a Danish proposal for evaluation and prevention.

作者信息

Grandjean P, Andersen D

机构信息

Institute of Community Health, Odense University, Denmark.

出版信息

J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1993;3 Suppl 1:265-70.

PMID:9857310
Abstract

The term scientific dishonesty covers the wide scope from consciously fraudulent actions to gross negligence and refers both to character trait and to actions. Scientific dishonesty may occur in any country, but reactions in Europe have been slow to emerge. On the basis of a thorough review, the Danish Medical Research Council therefore has made recommendations on how to handle and how to prevent scientific dishonesty. Suspected cases must be referred directly to a national committee chaired by a High Court judge. An ad hoc investigatory committee may be appointed in each case. If dishonesty is established, the institution then is asked to implement appropriate sanctions and to report on the actions taken to the national committee. Prevention of scientific dishonesty forms an essential part of good scientific practice and must have an impact on research training, requirements for data storage, guidelines for scientific publication, and criteria for evaluating grant proposals and promotions.

摘要

“科学不诚实”一词涵盖了从蓄意欺诈行为到严重疏忽的广泛范围,既指性格特征,也指行为。科学不诚实可能在任何国家发生,但欧洲对此的反应出现得较为迟缓。因此,丹麦医学研究理事会在全面审查的基础上,就如何处理和预防科学不诚实提出了建议。疑似案件必须直接提交给由高等法院法官主持的国家委员会。每个案件可能会任命一个特设调查委员会。如果确定存在不诚实行为,该机构随后将被要求实施适当制裁,并向国家委员会报告所采取的行动。预防科学不诚实是良好科学实践的重要组成部分,必须对研究培训、数据存储要求、科学出版指南以及评估资助申请和晋升的标准产生影响。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验