Neumann P, Hedenstierna G
Department of Clinical Physiology, University of Uppsala, Sweden.
Anesth Analg. 2001 Apr;92(4):950-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200104000-00030.
In acute lung injury, airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) with superimposed spontaneous breathing improves gas exchange compared with controlled mechanical ventilation. However, the release of airway pressure below the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) level may provoke lung collapse. Therefore, we compared gas exchange and hemodynamics using a crossover design in nine pigs with oleic acid-induced lung injury during CPAP breathing and APRV with a release pressure level of 0 and 5 cm H(2)O. At an identical minute ventilation (V(E) 8 L/min) spontaneous breathing averaged 55%, 67%, and 100% of V(E) during the two APRV modes and CPAP, respectively. Because of the concept of APRV, mean airway pressure was highest during CPAP and lowest during APRV with a release pressure of 0 cm H(2)O. Shunt was reduced to almost half during CPAP (6.6% of Q(t)) compared with both APRV-modes (13.0% of Q(t)). Cardiac output and oxygen consumption, in contrast, were similar during all three ventilatory settings. Thus, in our lung injury model, CPAP was superior to partial ventilatory support using APRV with and without positive end-expiratory pressure. This may be attributable to beneficial effects of spontaneous breathing on gas exchange as well as to rapid lung collapse during the phases of airway pressure release below the CPAP level. These findings may suggest that the amount of mechanical ventilatory support using the APRV mode should be kept at the necessary minimum.
Oxygenation is better with continuous positive airway pressure breathing than with partial mechanical ventilatory support using airway pressure release ventilation. Therefore, mechanical ventilatory support achieved by a cyclic release of airway pressure during APRV should be kept at the minimum level that enables enough ventilatory support for patients to avoid respiratory muscle fatigue.
在急性肺损伤中,与控制性机械通气相比,叠加自主呼吸的气道压力释放通气(APRV)可改善气体交换。然而,气道压力降至持续气道正压(CPAP)水平以下可能会导致肺萎陷。因此,我们采用交叉设计,比较了9只油酸诱导肺损伤猪在CPAP呼吸以及释放压力水平为0和5 cm H₂O的APRV期间的气体交换和血流动力学。在相同分钟通气量(V̇E 8 L/min)时,自主呼吸在两种APRV模式和CPAP期间分别平均占V̇E的55%、67%和100%。由于APRV的概念,平均气道压力在CPAP期间最高,在释放压力为0 cm H₂O的APRV期间最低。与两种APRV模式(占心输出量的13.0%)相比,CPAP期间分流减少至几乎一半(占心输出量的6.6%)。相比之下,在所有三种通气设置下,心输出量和氧耗相似。因此,在我们的肺损伤模型中,CPAP优于使用有或无呼气末正压的APRV的部分通气支持。这可能归因于自主呼吸对气体交换的有益作用以及在气道压力降至CPAP水平以下阶段的快速肺萎陷。这些发现可能表明,使用APRV模式的机械通气支持量应保持在必要的最低水平。
持续气道正压通气的氧合效果优于使用气道压力释放通气的部分机械通气支持。因此,在APRV期间通过周期性释放气道压力实现的机械通气支持应保持在能够为患者提供足够通气支持以避免呼吸肌疲劳的最低水平。