Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛患者中重度抑郁症的替代诊断标准。

Alternative diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in patients with chronic pain.

作者信息

Wilson Keith G, Mikail Samuel F, D'Eon Joyce L, Minns Joanne E

机构信息

Institute for Rehabilitation Research and Development, The Rehabilitation Centre, 505 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8M2, Canada Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Southdown Institute, Aurora, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Pain. 2001 Apr;91(3):227-234. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00440-1.

Abstract

Chronic pain is associated with high rates of major depressive disorder (MDD), but somatic symptoms caused by pain may complicate the diagnosis of MDD. Different methods to address this issue include the adoption of an inclusive approach to diagnosis (i.e. including all symptoms when assessing MDD, regardless of their presumed cause), an etiologic approach (i.e. disregarding symptoms that are caused by medical problems), and a substitutive approach (i.e. replacing somatic symptoms with non-somatic alternatives). In this study, 129 patients with chronic pain (56 men and 73 women) underwent semi-structured interviews addressing 23 individual symptoms of MDD. Detailed probing was undertaken into patients' perceptions of the causes of those symptoms that could potentially be brought on by pain. We found that the prevalence of MDD was highest with the inclusive diagnostic method (35.7%), lowest with an etiologic approach that discounted symptoms based on patient attributions (19.4%), and intermediate with the substitutive method (30.3%). Although some symptoms, such as insomnia, fatigue, and difficulty concentrating, were reported by 34--53% of the patients who did not meet criteria for MDD, they were still more common among those who did (85--94%, P<0.001). Patients who met criteria for MDD with the inclusive method, but who did not meet criteria using the etiologic method, had Beck Depression Inventory scores (M=24.5) that were comparable to those of patients who were consistently classified with MDD across methods (M=25.6). These scores were much higher than those of patients who were consistently classified without MDD (M=13.8, P<0.001). In conclusion, excluding criterion symptoms that patients attribute to pain can reduce the observed prevalence of MDD by about 45%. However, this method introduces a problem of false-negative diagnoses that appears to be more significant than the problem of false positives associated with the inappropriate inclusion of somatic symptoms.

摘要

慢性疼痛与重度抑郁症(MDD)的高发病率相关,但疼痛引起的躯体症状可能会使MDD的诊断复杂化。解决这一问题的不同方法包括采用包容性诊断方法(即在评估MDD时包括所有症状,无论其假定原因如何)、病因学方法(即忽略由医疗问题引起的症状)和替代方法(即用非躯体症状替代躯体症状)。在本研究中,129名慢性疼痛患者(56名男性和73名女性)接受了针对MDD的23种个体症状的半结构化访谈。对患者对那些可能由疼痛引起的症状的原因的看法进行了详细探究。我们发现,采用包容性诊断方法时MDD的患病率最高(35.7%),采用基于患者归因排除症状的病因学方法时最低(19.4%),采用替代方法时居中(30.3%)。虽然一些症状,如失眠、疲劳和注意力不集中,在不符合MDD标准的患者中有34%-53%报告有这些症状,但在符合标准的患者中仍然更常见(85%-94%,P<0.001)。采用包容性方法符合MDD标准但采用病因学方法不符合标准的患者,其贝克抑郁量表得分(M=24.5)与在所有方法中均被一致分类为MDD的患者(M=25.6)相当。这些得分远高于始终被分类为无MDD的患者(M=13.8,P<0.001)。总之,排除患者归因于疼痛的标准症状可使观察到的MDD患病率降低约45%。然而,这种方法引入了假阴性诊断的问题,这似乎比与不适当纳入躯体症状相关的假阳性问题更严重。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验