de Certaines J D, Cathelineau G
Eugène Marquis Cancer Institute, Biomedical NMR Laboratory, Rennes, France.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Apr;13(4):632-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1089.
Despite advances in international cooperation, the application of the safety regulations of different countries remains an important challenge for manufacturers and health care workers in the European Union. Rapid technological development during the last 20 years, and the still controversial nature of certain potential effects of magnetic or electromagnetic fields, make the task particularly difficult for MRI and MRS. As the relevant literature is rather extensive, the present work will limit its goals to four questions: 1) How is MRI and MRS safety regulation managed within the European Union? 2) Concerning direct potential physiological effects, what is presently well known and controlled, and, conversely, what are the remaining open (and often controversial) questions? 3) As metallic implants are probably the main risk in routine MRI, what regulatory strategy is in progress in Europe? 4) As indirect risks related to artifacts must not be underestimated, what European programs have been developed for quality assessment in MRI and MRS? In all of these fields, evidence is provided demonstrating the need for a mutual recognition of common standards for the European Union and the United States.
尽管国际合作取得了进展,但不同国家安全法规的应用对欧盟的制造商和医护人员来说仍是一项重大挑战。过去20年里技术的快速发展,以及磁场或电磁场某些潜在影响仍存在争议的性质,使得磁共振成像(MRI)和磁共振波谱(MRS)的相关任务尤为艰巨。由于相关文献颇为广泛,本研究将目标限定为四个问题:1)欧盟内部如何管理MRI和MRS的安全法规?2)关于直接潜在生理影响,目前已知且可控的是什么,相反,仍存在哪些未解决(且常具争议)的问题?3)由于金属植入物可能是常规MRI的主要风险,欧洲正在推行何种监管策略?4)由于与伪影相关的间接风险不可低估,欧洲已开展了哪些用于MRI和MRS质量评估的项目?在所有这些领域,都提供了证据表明欧盟和美国需要相互认可共同标准。