Beydon N, Trang-Pham H, Bernard A, Gaultier C
Service de Physiologie, Hôpital Robert Debré, Université Paris VII, 48 Bd. Serurier, 75019 Paris, France.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2001 Mar;31(3):238-46. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1034.
Measurement of bronchial airway responsiveness requires noninvasive techniques in young children. The study was designed to examine the changes in resistance as measured using the interrupter technique (Rint) at the dose of methacholine (M) that induced a fall in transcutaneous partial pressure in O2 (P(tc)O2) > or = 20% (PD(20)P(tc)O2) in young children. Rint was calculated using the linear back-extrapolation method (Rint(L)) and the end-interrupter method (Rint(EI)). Twenty-two children (mean age, 5.2 +/- 1.1 years; range, 3.4 - 7.1 years) with nonspecific respiratory symptoms (mainly chronic cough, n = 17) were tested. P(tc)O2, Rint(L), and Rint(EI) were measured before the test, after saline challenge (baseline (B)), after each dose of M delivered by a dosimeter, and after bronchodilator (BD) inhalation. P(tc)O2 decreased significantly during M challenge, from 85 +/- 6 mmHg (B) to 62 +/- 9 mmHg (P < 0.05), and increased after BD inhalation, to 82 +/- 8 mmHg. Rint(L) and Rint(EI) increased significantly during M challenge, from 0.94 +/- 0.2 KPa/L/s and 1.11 +/- 0.19 KPa/L/s (B) to 1.27 +/- 0.35 KPa/L/s and 1.47 +/- 0.37 KPa/L/s, respectively (P < 0.05), and decreased after BD inhalation to 0.80 +/- 0.17 KPa/L/s and 0.95 +/- 0.18 KPa/L/s, respectively. Nineteen of 22 children reached the PD(20)P(tc)O2 at a dose of M ranging from 50-400 microg. At the PD(20)P(tc)O2, significant changes in Rint(L) and Rint(EI) (sensitivity index (SI) > or = 2) were found in 79% and 63% of children, respectively. We conclude that: 1) M challenge using P(tc)O2 is safe in young children; and 2) our findings are not in favor of the use of Rint as the only indicator of bronchial reaction in young children during M challenge.
在幼儿中测量支气管气道反应性需要采用非侵入性技术。本研究旨在检测在幼儿中,使用间断技术(Rint)测量的阻力变化,该测量是在能使经皮氧分压(P(tc)O2)下降≥20%(PD(20)P(tc)O2)的乙酰甲胆碱(M)剂量下进行的。Rint采用线性反向外推法(Rint(L))和终末间断法(Rint(EI))进行计算。对22名有非特异性呼吸道症状(主要是慢性咳嗽,n = 17)的儿童(平均年龄5.2±1.1岁;范围3.4 - 7.1岁)进行了测试。在测试前、盐水激发后(基线(B))、通过剂量计给予每剂M后以及吸入支气管扩张剂(BD)后,测量P(tc)O2、Rint(L)和Rint(EI)。在M激发期间,P(tc)O2显著下降,从(B)时的85±6 mmHg降至62±9 mmHg(P < 0.05),在吸入BD后升高至82±8 mmHg。在M激发期间,Rint(L)和Rint(EI)显著升高,分别从(B)时的0.94±0.2 KPa/L/s和1.11±0.19 KPa/L/s升至1.27±0.35 KPa/L/s和1.47±0.37 KPa/L/s(P < 0.05),在吸入BD后分别降至0.80±0.17 KPa/L/s和0.95±0.18 KPa/L/s。22名儿童中有19名在M剂量为50 - 400微克时达到了PD(20)P(tc)O2。在PD(20)P(tc)O2时,分别在79%和63%的儿童中发现Rint(L)和Rint(EI)有显著变化(敏感指数(SI)≥2)。我们得出结论:1)使用P(tc)O2进行M激发在幼儿中是安全的;2)我们的研究结果不支持在幼儿M激发期间将Rint作为支气管反应的唯一指标。