Phagoo S B, Wilson N M, Silverman M
Dept of Paediatrics and Neonatal Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Eur Respir J. 1996 Jul;9(7):1374-80. doi: 10.1183/09031936.96.09071374.
The interrupter technique for measuring airway resistance is non-invasive and convenient, and therefore ideally suited for the assessment of induced changes in airway calibre in preschool children. The aim of this study was to evaluate a commercially available interrupter device (based on Microlab 4000), which calculates the interrupter resistance (Rint) from pressure and flow following a brief interruption of expiration during quiet breathing. The repeatability of Rint was assessed, and its response to methacholine challenge and the bronchodilator salbutamol were compared with an indirect technique, the fall in transcutaneous oxygen tension (Ptc,O2), using the sensitivity index (SI, i.e. the change after challenge expressed in multiples of the baseline standard deviation) in 12 wheezy children (aged 3 yrs +/- 2 months). The mean (SD) baseline value of Rint was 0.91 (0.20) kPa.L-1.s. Short-term repeatability and baseline variability were satisfactory for Rint (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.6; mean intrasubject coefficient of variation = 13%). Although 10 of the 12 subjects obtained a significant response using Rint at maximal bronchoconstriction (i.e. SI > 2), overall, Rint was five times less sensitive than Ptc,O2 (geometric mean SI: Rint 3 vs Ptc,O2 16; p < 0.0001). Reversal of obstruction with administration of a bronchodilator was clearly demonstrated in almost all subjects: Rint after challenge (mean +/- SD) 1.25 (0.22) kPa.L-1.s; after salbutamol 0.78 (0.19) kPa.L-1.s; p < 0.001. In conclusion, the convenient interrupter resistance method appears more promising for detecting bronchodilator responses than induced bronchoconstriction in wheezy preschool children; however, measurement of transcutaneous oxygen tension provides a reliable indirect means of detecting induced airway obstruction in this age-group.
用于测量气道阻力的阻断器技术是非侵入性的且操作方便,因此非常适合评估学龄前儿童气道管径的诱发变化。本研究的目的是评估一种市售的阻断器设备(基于Microlab 4000),该设备在安静呼吸期间短暂呼气中断后,根据压力和流量计算阻断器阻力(Rint)。评估了Rint的可重复性,并将其对乙酰甲胆碱激发试验和支气管扩张剂沙丁胺醇的反应与一种间接技术——经皮氧分压(Ptc,O2)下降进行比较,使用敏感性指数(SI,即激发试验后变化以基线标准差倍数表示)对12名喘息儿童(年龄3岁±2个月)进行评估。Rint的平均(标准差)基线值为0.91(0.20)kPa·L-1·s。Rint的短期可重复性和基线变异性令人满意(组内相关系数 = 0.6;平均受试者内变异系数 = 13%)。虽然12名受试者中有10名在最大支气管收缩时使用Rint获得了显著反应(即SI>2),但总体而言,Rint的敏感性比Ptc,O2低五倍(几何平均SI:Rint为3,Ptc,O2为16;p<0.0001)。几乎所有受试者均清楚显示支气管扩张剂给药后阻塞的逆转:激发试验后Rint(平均值±标准差)为1.25(0.22)kPa·L-1·s;沙丁胺醇给药后为0.78(0.19)kPa·L-1·s;p<0.001。总之,对于检测喘息学龄前儿童的支气管扩张剂反应,方便的阻断器阻力方法似乎比诱发支气管收缩更有前景;然而,经皮氧分压测量为检测该年龄组诱发的气道阻塞提供了一种可靠的间接方法。