Gunnoe M L, Braver S L
Department of Psychology, Calvin College, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.
Law Hum Behav. 2001 Feb;25(1):25-43. doi: 10.1023/a:1005687825155.
Findings from comparisons of joint and sole custody families that do not control for predivorce differences in demographic and family process variables (factors that may predispose families to choose or be awarded joint custody) are of limited generalizability, since obtained group differences may be attributable to predisposing (self-selection) factors, custody, or both. This study compared a random sample of 254 recently separated, not-yet-divorced families on 71 predivorce variables that might plausibly differentiate between families awarded joint legal versus sole maternal custody. Twenty such factors were identified and controlled for in subsequent comparisons of 52 sole maternal and 26 joint legal custody families 2 years postdivorce. Families with joint custody had more frequent father-child visitation, lower maternal satisfaction with custody arrangements, more rapid maternal repartnering, and fewer child adjustment problems (net of predivorce selection factors). Moreover, these effects did not appear to be moderated by level of predecree parental conflict. No association between custody and fathers' compliance with child support orders was obtained.
在未对离婚前人口统计学和家庭过程变量(可能使家庭倾向于选择或被授予共同监护权的因素)差异进行控制的情况下,对共同监护和单独监护家庭进行比较的研究结果,其普遍适用性有限,因为所获得的组间差异可能归因于倾向因素(自我选择)、监护权类型或两者兼而有之。本研究对254个近期分居、尚未离婚的家庭进行了随机抽样,这些家庭涉及71个离婚前变量,这些变量可能合理地区分被授予共同法律监护权与单独母亲监护权的家庭。在随后对52个单独母亲监护和26个共同法律监护家庭离婚两年后的比较中,确定并控制了其中20个这样的因素。共同监护的家庭有更频繁的父子探视、母亲对监护安排的满意度较低、母亲更快地重新建立伴侣关系,以及孩子的适应问题较少(扣除离婚前的选择因素)。此外,这些影响似乎不受离婚前父母冲突程度的调节。未发现监护权与父亲遵守子女抚养令之间存在关联。