Koster Tara, Castro-Martín Teresa
Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Institute of Economy, Geography and Demography, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Popul. 2021 Oct 20;37(4-5):933-957. doi: 10.1007/s10680-021-09593-1. eCollection 2021 Nov.
Separated fathers are generally assumed to be less involved with their children than partnered fathers. Yet, extant research on separated fathers has mainly focused on nonresident fathers without taking into consideration the existing diversity in post-separation residence arrangements. In fact, separated resident and shared residence fathers may possibly be more involved than partnered fathers, because the former likely bear primary childcare responsibilities, while the latter often act as secondary caregivers. This study extends previous research by investigating father involvement via regular care and leisure activities across a full range of separated fathers, and how it compares to that of partnered fathers, as well as whether patterns differ by father's education. Data from the New Families in the Netherlands survey ( = 1592) reveal that as compared to partnered fathers, shared residence fathers and especially resident fathers are more actively involved in the regular care of their child, whereas nonresident fathers are less involved. Results are similar for leisure, except that partnered fathers are similarly involved as shared residence fathers in this activity. Education also matters: involvement of fathers across different post-separation residence arrangements is more similar to that of partnered fathers when being highly educated. These findings suggest that including resident and shared residence fathers in the picture offers a more optimistic view of fathers' post-separation parenting role, because these separated fathers are actually more actively involved in childrearing than partnered fathers.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10680-021-09593-1.
一般认为,与有伴侣的父亲相比,分居的父亲与孩子的互动较少。然而,现有的关于分居父亲的研究主要集中在非居住在一起的父亲,而没有考虑分居后居住安排的多样性。事实上,分居后居住在一起的父亲和共享居住权的父亲可能比有伴侣的父亲参与度更高,因为前者可能承担主要的育儿责任,而后者往往扮演次要照顾者的角色。本研究通过调查各类分居父亲在日常照料和休闲活动中的父亲参与度,以及与有伴侣的父亲相比情况如何,以及模式是否因父亲的教育程度而有所不同,从而扩展了先前的研究。荷兰新家庭调查(n = 1592)的数据显示,与有伴侣的父亲相比,共享居住权的父亲,尤其是居住在一起的父亲,在孩子的日常照料中参与度更高,而非居住在一起的父亲参与度较低。在休闲方面结果类似,只是在这项活动中有伴侣的父亲与共享居住权的父亲参与度相当。教育程度也很重要:当父亲受过高等教育时,不同分居后居住安排的父亲的参与度与有伴侣的父亲更为相似。这些发现表明,将居住在一起的父亲和共享居住权的父亲纳入研究范围,能让人们对父亲分居后的育儿角色有更乐观的看法,因为这些分居的父亲实际上比有伴侣的父亲更积极地参与育儿。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10680-021-09593-1获取的补充材料。