Lehane P, Stubbs D
Environmental Health & Trading Standards, Bromley Civic Centre, UK.
Appl Ergon. 2001 Apr;32(2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/s0003-6870(00)00047-8.
Slips and trips are a major cause of injury and lost time, and remain so despite specific initiatives. The work presented here focuses on how accident subjects and their managers each perceive the circumstances of an accident with respect to causal responsibility. To investigate this issue, a research questionnaire was designed, piloted and then applied to 33 occupational slip and trip accidents reported to a Local Authority Inspectorate. The results showed important differences in the attribution of causal responsibility between those who experience and those who investigate slips and trip accidents. The levels of agreement between individual accident subjects and their managers was at best fair (using kappa). The consequences of this and the limited scope of investigation carried out by managers is highlighted and the need for improved training and the development of a practical model of risk assessment and investigation for managers is advanced.
滑倒和绊倒事故是导致受伤和误工的主要原因,尽管采取了具体措施,但情况依然如此。本文所呈现的研究聚焦于事故当事人及其管理人员如何看待事故情形中的因果责任。为调查这一问题,设计了一份调查问卷,先进行了预试,然后应用于向地方当局检查机构报告的33起职业滑倒和绊倒事故。结果表明,经历滑倒和绊倒事故的人员与调查此类事故的人员在因果责任归因上存在重大差异。个别事故当事人与其管理人员之间的一致程度充其量只能说是尚可(使用卡帕系数)。文中强调了这一情况的后果以及管理人员调查范围的有限性,并提出有必要改进培训,为管理人员开发一个实用的风险评估与调查模型。