• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住院患者急性重症哮喘的皮质类固醇治疗

Corticosteroids for acute severe asthma in hospitalised patients.

作者信息

Manser R, Reid D, Abramson M

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology and Health Service Evaluation Unit, Ground floor, Connibere building, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA, 3050.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD001740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001740.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001740
PMID:11279726
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are currently used routinely in the management of acute severe asthma. The optimal dose and route of administration continues to be debated. Some investigators have reported a greater benefit of higher doses of corticosteroids in the management of severe asthma, while others have not.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether higher doses of systemic corticosteroids (oral, intravenous or intramuscular) are more effective than lower doses in the management of patients with acute severe asthma requiring hospital admission.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma Register. In addition, primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were selected for inclusion in the review if they met the following broad inclusion criteria: described as randomised controlled trials, included patients with acute severe asthma, compared different doses of corticosteroids (any route) in 2 or more treatment arms, and had a minimum period of follow up of 24 hours. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion and disagreement was resolved by third party adjudication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers if the authors were unable to verify the validity of information. Missing data were obtained from authors or calculated from other data presented in the paper. The data were analysed as weighted mean differences (WMD) for primary pulmonary function outcomes using a fixed effects model. For the purposes of the review, three broad categories of corticosteroid dose (equivalent dose of methylprednisolone in 24 hours) were defined in advance: low dose (< or = 80 mg), medium dose (> 80 mg and < or = 360 mg) and high dose (> 360 mg). There were thus 3 main comparison groups: low versus medium dose, medium versus high dose and low versus high dose.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials were included; a total of 344 adult patients have been studied (96 with low dose, 85 with medium dose and 163 with high dose corticosteroids). Only 6 trials provided sufficient data for the meta-analysis. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences detected in % predicted FEV1 among comparison groups after 24, 48 or 72 hours. At 48 hours, the weighted mean difference was -3.3% predicted (95% confidence interval -12.4 to + 5.8) for the low vs medium dose comparison, -1.9% predicted (95% CI -8.1 to + 4.3) for the medium vs high dose comparison and + 0.5% predicted (95% CI - 7.8 to + 8.8) for the low vs high dose comparison. There appeared to be no significant differences in side effects or rates of respiratory failure among the varying doses of corticosteroids. A further search was conducted on 3rd August 2000. No new trials were identified.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: No differences were identified among the different doses of corticosteroids in acute asthma requiring hospital admission. Low dose corticosteroids (< or = 80 mg/day of methylprednisolone or < or = 400 mg/day of hydrocortisone) appear to be adequate in the initial management of these adult patients. Higher doses do not appear to offer a therapeutic advantage.

摘要

背景

目前,皮质类固醇常用于急性重症哮喘的治疗。其最佳剂量和给药途径仍存在争议。一些研究人员报告称,高剂量皮质类固醇在重症哮喘治疗中疗效更佳,而另一些人则未发现此现象。

目的

确定在需要住院治疗的急性重症哮喘患者的管理中,高剂量全身性皮质类固醇(口服、静脉注射或肌肉注射)是否比低剂量更有效。

检索策略

从Cochrane气道组哮喘注册库中识别随机对照试验。此外,联系了主要作者和内容专家以识别符合条件的研究。还检索了纳入研究的参考文献、已知综述和文献。

选择标准

如果研究符合以下广泛的纳入标准,则选择纳入综述:描述为随机对照试验,纳入急性重症哮喘患者,在两个或更多治疗组中比较不同剂量的皮质类固醇(任何途径),且随访期至少为24小时。两名评审员独立评估研究是否纳入,如有分歧则通过第三方裁决解决。

数据收集与分析

如果作者无法核实信息的有效性,则由两名评审员独立提取数据。缺失数据从作者处获取或根据论文中提供的其他数据计算得出。使用固定效应模型对主要肺功能结果的数据进行加权平均差(WMD)分析。为了本综述的目的,预先定义了三类皮质类固醇剂量(24小时内甲基泼尼松龙的等效剂量):低剂量(≤80毫克)、中剂量(>80毫克且≤360毫克)和高剂量(>360毫克)。因此有3个主要比较组:低剂量与中剂量、中剂量与高剂量、低剂量与高剂量。

主要结果

纳入9项试验;共研究了344例成年患者(96例接受低剂量皮质类固醇治疗,85例接受中剂量治疗,163例接受高剂量治疗)。只有6项试验提供了足够的数据进行荟萃分析。在24、48或72小时后,各比较组之间预测的第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)百分比在临床或统计学上均无显著差异。在48小时时,低剂量与中剂量比较的加权平均差为预测值的-3.3%(95%置信区间-12.4至+5.8),中剂量与高剂量比较为预测值的-1.9%(95%置信区间-8.1至+4.3),低剂量与高剂量比较为预测值的+0.5%(95%置信区间-7.8至+8.8)。不同剂量的皮质类固醇在副作用或呼吸衰竭发生率方面似乎没有显著差异。于2000年8月3日进行了进一步检索,未发现新的试验。

评审员结论

在需要住院治疗的急性哮喘患者中,不同剂量的皮质类固醇之间未发现差异。低剂量皮质类固醇(甲基泼尼松龙≤80毫克/天或氢化可的松≤400毫克/天)似乎足以用于这些成年患者的初始治疗。高剂量似乎没有治疗优势。

相似文献

1
Corticosteroids for acute severe asthma in hospitalised patients.住院患者急性重症哮喘的皮质类固醇治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD001740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001740.
2
Corticosteroids for acute severe asthma in hospitalised patients.住院患者急性重症哮喘的糖皮质激素治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2001(2):CD001740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001740.
3
Intramuscular versus oral corticosteroids to reduce relapses following discharge from the emergency department for acute asthma.肌肉注射与口服皮质类固醇用于减少急性哮喘患者从急诊科出院后的复发情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 2;6(6):CD012629. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012629.pub2.
4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
5
Systemic interventions for treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN overlap syndrome.全身性治疗史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征(SJS)、中毒性表皮坏死松解症(TEN)和 SJS/TEN 重叠综合征。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 11;3(3):CD013130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013130.pub2.
6
Corticosteroids for preventing relapse following acute exacerbations of asthma.用于预防哮喘急性加重后复发的皮质类固醇。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD000195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000195.
7
Corticosteroids for preventing relapse following acute exacerbations of asthma.用于预防哮喘急性加重后复发的皮质类固醇。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000195.
8
Systemic corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19: Equity-related analyses and update on evidence.全身性皮质类固醇治疗 COVID-19:与公平相关的分析和证据更新。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD014963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.pub2.
9
Early use of inhaled corticosteroids in the emergency department treatment of acute asthma.在急诊科治疗急性哮喘时早期使用吸入性糖皮质激素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD002308. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002308.
10
Continuous versus intermittent beta-agonists in the treatment of acute asthma.治疗急性哮喘时持续使用与间歇使用β受体激动剂的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(4):CD001115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001115.

引用本文的文献

1
GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma.GEMA 5.3. 《西班牙哮喘管理指南》。
Open Respir Arch. 2023 Sep 19;5(4):100277. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100277. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
2
Effects of Pre-Hospital Dexamethasone Administration on Outcomes of Patients with COPD and Asthma Exacerbation; a Cross-Sectional Study.院前给予地塞米松对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘急性加重患者预后的影响;一项横断面研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 12;11(1):e56. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.2037. eCollection 2023.
3
Pediatric Simulation-Based Prehospital Training Course in Botswana.
博茨瓦纳基于模拟的儿科院前培训课程
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 15;6(3):C64-C189. doi: 10.21980/J8306S. eCollection 2021 Jul.
4
Summary of Korean Asthma Guideline.韩国哮喘指南摘要。
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2023 Jul;86(3):158-165. doi: 10.4046/trd.2023.0052. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
Interventions for escalation of therapy for acute exacerbations of asthma in children: an overview of Cochrane Reviews.儿童哮喘急性加重期治疗升级的干预措施:Cochrane系统评价综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 5;8(8):CD012977. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012977.pub2.
6
Management of severe asthma exacerbation: guidelines from the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française and the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies.重度哮喘急性加重的管理:来自法国急诊医学协会、法语国家复苏协会以及法国儿科重症监护与急诊小组的指南
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Oct 10;9(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0584-x.
7
Ohio Pediatric Asthma Repository: Opportunities to Revise Care Practices to Decrease Time to Physiologic Readiness for Discharge.俄亥俄州儿科哮喘资料库:修订护理措施以缩短达到出院生理准备时间的机会。
Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Jun;8(6):305-313. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2017-0085. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Asthma Exacerbations: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment.哮喘恶化:发病机制、预防和治疗。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jul-Aug;5(4):918-927. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.05.001.
9
Korean Asthma Guideline 2014: Summary of Major Updates to the Korean Asthma Guideline 2014.《2014年韩国哮喘指南:2014年韩国哮喘指南主要更新内容总结》
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2016 Jul;79(3):111-20. doi: 10.4046/trd.2016.79.3.111. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Best Treatment Guidelines For Bronchial Asthma.支气管哮喘最佳治疗指南
Med J Armed Forces India. 2007 Jul;63(3):264-8. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80151-1. Epub 2011 Jul 21.