Suppr超能文献

住院患者急性重症哮喘的皮质类固醇治疗

Corticosteroids for acute severe asthma in hospitalised patients.

作者信息

Manser R, Reid D, Abramson M

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology and Health Service Evaluation Unit, Ground floor, Connibere building, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan St, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, AUSTRALIA, 3050.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(1):CD001740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001740.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids are currently used routinely in the management of acute severe asthma. The optimal dose and route of administration continues to be debated. Some investigators have reported a greater benefit of higher doses of corticosteroids in the management of severe asthma, while others have not.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether higher doses of systemic corticosteroids (oral, intravenous or intramuscular) are more effective than lower doses in the management of patients with acute severe asthma requiring hospital admission.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomised controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Airways Group Asthma Register. In addition, primary authors and content experts were contacted to identify eligible studies. Bibliographies from included studies, known reviews and texts were also searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were selected for inclusion in the review if they met the following broad inclusion criteria: described as randomised controlled trials, included patients with acute severe asthma, compared different doses of corticosteroids (any route) in 2 or more treatment arms, and had a minimum period of follow up of 24 hours. Two reviewers independently assessed the studies for inclusion and disagreement was resolved by third party adjudication.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two reviewers if the authors were unable to verify the validity of information. Missing data were obtained from authors or calculated from other data presented in the paper. The data were analysed as weighted mean differences (WMD) for primary pulmonary function outcomes using a fixed effects model. For the purposes of the review, three broad categories of corticosteroid dose (equivalent dose of methylprednisolone in 24 hours) were defined in advance: low dose (< or = 80 mg), medium dose (> 80 mg and < or = 360 mg) and high dose (> 360 mg). There were thus 3 main comparison groups: low versus medium dose, medium versus high dose and low versus high dose.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine trials were included; a total of 344 adult patients have been studied (96 with low dose, 85 with medium dose and 163 with high dose corticosteroids). Only 6 trials provided sufficient data for the meta-analysis. There were no clinically or statistically significant differences detected in % predicted FEV1 among comparison groups after 24, 48 or 72 hours. At 48 hours, the weighted mean difference was -3.3% predicted (95% confidence interval -12.4 to + 5.8) for the low vs medium dose comparison, -1.9% predicted (95% CI -8.1 to + 4.3) for the medium vs high dose comparison and + 0.5% predicted (95% CI - 7.8 to + 8.8) for the low vs high dose comparison. There appeared to be no significant differences in side effects or rates of respiratory failure among the varying doses of corticosteroids. A further search was conducted on 3rd August 2000. No new trials were identified.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: No differences were identified among the different doses of corticosteroids in acute asthma requiring hospital admission. Low dose corticosteroids (< or = 80 mg/day of methylprednisolone or < or = 400 mg/day of hydrocortisone) appear to be adequate in the initial management of these adult patients. Higher doses do not appear to offer a therapeutic advantage.

摘要

背景

目前,皮质类固醇常用于急性重症哮喘的治疗。其最佳剂量和给药途径仍存在争议。一些研究人员报告称,高剂量皮质类固醇在重症哮喘治疗中疗效更佳,而另一些人则未发现此现象。

目的

确定在需要住院治疗的急性重症哮喘患者的管理中,高剂量全身性皮质类固醇(口服、静脉注射或肌肉注射)是否比低剂量更有效。

检索策略

从Cochrane气道组哮喘注册库中识别随机对照试验。此外,联系了主要作者和内容专家以识别符合条件的研究。还检索了纳入研究的参考文献、已知综述和文献。

选择标准

如果研究符合以下广泛的纳入标准,则选择纳入综述:描述为随机对照试验,纳入急性重症哮喘患者,在两个或更多治疗组中比较不同剂量的皮质类固醇(任何途径),且随访期至少为24小时。两名评审员独立评估研究是否纳入,如有分歧则通过第三方裁决解决。

数据收集与分析

如果作者无法核实信息的有效性,则由两名评审员独立提取数据。缺失数据从作者处获取或根据论文中提供的其他数据计算得出。使用固定效应模型对主要肺功能结果的数据进行加权平均差(WMD)分析。为了本综述的目的,预先定义了三类皮质类固醇剂量(24小时内甲基泼尼松龙的等效剂量):低剂量(≤80毫克)、中剂量(>80毫克且≤360毫克)和高剂量(>360毫克)。因此有3个主要比较组:低剂量与中剂量、中剂量与高剂量、低剂量与高剂量。

主要结果

纳入9项试验;共研究了344例成年患者(96例接受低剂量皮质类固醇治疗,85例接受中剂量治疗,163例接受高剂量治疗)。只有6项试验提供了足够的数据进行荟萃分析。在24、48或72小时后,各比较组之间预测的第1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)百分比在临床或统计学上均无显著差异。在48小时时,低剂量与中剂量比较的加权平均差为预测值的-3.3%(95%置信区间-12.4至+5.8),中剂量与高剂量比较为预测值的-1.9%(95%置信区间-8.1至+4.3),低剂量与高剂量比较为预测值的+0.5%(95%置信区间-7.8至+8.8)。不同剂量的皮质类固醇在副作用或呼吸衰竭发生率方面似乎没有显著差异。于2000年8月3日进行了进一步检索,未发现新的试验。

评审员结论

在需要住院治疗的急性哮喘患者中,不同剂量的皮质类固醇之间未发现差异。低剂量皮质类固醇(甲基泼尼松龙≤80毫克/天或氢化可的松≤400毫克/天)似乎足以用于这些成年患者的初始治疗。高剂量似乎没有治疗优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验