Suppr超能文献

α-二氢麦角隐亭预防偏头痛:一项与氟桂利嗪对比的多中心双盲研究

Alpha-dihydroergocryptine in the prophylaxis of migraine: a multicenter double-blind study versus flunarizine.

作者信息

Bussone G, Cerbo R, Martucci N, Micieli G, Zanferrari C, Grazzi L, Fabbrini G, Cavallini A, Granella F, Ambrosoli L, Mailland F, Poli A, Manzoni G

机构信息

Headache Centre, C. Besta Neurological Institute, Via Celoria, 11, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Headache. 1999 Jun;39(6):426-31. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1999.3906426.x.

Abstract

This multicenter, double-blind, clinical study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of alpha-dihydroergocryptine and flunarizine in the prophylaxis of migraine without aura. One hundred thirty-five patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society were enrolled at five neurologic centers. The study design included a 1-month pretreatment phase with placebo; a 6-month, double-blind, double-dummy treatment phase with alpha-dihydroergocryptine (10 mg twice daily) or flunarizine (5 mg once daily); a further 3-month follow-up phase without treatment. Efficacy was assessed using the patient's diary. Laboratory tests, vital signs, and adverse events were monitored. Analysis of covariance for repeated measures was performed on the intent-to-treat sample. Both treatments led to a significant reduction in the frequency of migraine, days with headache, and use of relief medication. Overall, 51% of those treated with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 49% of those treated with flunarizine were responders (50% or greater reduction in attack frequency), the average percentage of reduction being 64% with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 51% with flunarizine. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of incidence of adverse events; dizziness and weight gain were the most frequent observed adverse events with alpha-dihydroergocryptine and flunarizine, respectively. Based on the overall improvement in migraine parameters, alpha-dihydroergocryptine can be recommended for use in migraine prophylaxis.

摘要

本多中心、双盲临床研究旨在比较α-二氢麦角隐亭和氟桂利嗪预防无先兆偏头痛的疗效和安全性。在五个神经科中心招募了135名符合国际头痛协会诊断标准的患者。研究设计包括为期1个月的安慰剂预处理阶段;为期6个月的双盲、双模拟治疗阶段,使用α-二氢麦角隐亭(每日两次,每次10毫克)或氟桂利嗪(每日一次,每次5毫克);以及为期3个月的无治疗随访阶段。使用患者日记评估疗效。监测实验室检查、生命体征和不良事件。对意向性治疗样本进行重复测量的协方差分析。两种治疗均使偏头痛发作频率、头痛天数和缓解药物使用量显著减少。总体而言,接受α-二氢麦角隐亭治疗的患者中有51%、接受氟桂利嗪治疗的患者中有49%为有效应答者(发作频率降低50%或更多),α-二氢麦角隐亭的平均降低百分比为64%,氟桂利嗪为51%。两组不良事件发生率无显著差异;头晕和体重增加分别是α-二氢麦角隐亭和氟桂利嗪最常观察到的不良事件。基于偏头痛参数的总体改善,α-二氢麦角隐亭可推荐用于偏头痛预防。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验