Suppr超能文献

Whose interests do lay people represent? Towards an understanding of the role of lay people as members of committees.

作者信息

Hogg C, Williamson C

机构信息

Consumers for Ethics in Research (CERES), Faculty of Environmental and Social Studies, University of North London, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2001 Mar;4(1):2-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00106.x.

Abstract

Increasingly, lay people are appointed as members to health service committees. The term 'lay' is used loosely and the reasons for involving lay people are seldom clearly defined. This paper argues that the different roles that lay people play need to be explicitly defined in order for their contributions to be realized. Although lay members of health service committees are generally assumed to be working for patients' interests, our observations lead us to think that some lay people tend to support professionals' or managers' interests rather than patients' interests as patients would define them. We suggest that lay people fall into three broad categories: supporters of dominant (professional) interests, supporters of challenging (managerial) interests and supporters of repressed (patient) interests. These alignments should be taken into account in appointments to health service bodies. Further research is needed on the alignments and roles of lay members.

摘要

相似文献

2
Rationalising public participation in the health service: the case of research ethics committees.
Health Place. 2004 Dec;10(4):339-48. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.08.004.
3
Lay REC members: patient or public?
J Med Ethics. 2013 Dec;39(12):780-2. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100642. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
4
Whose voices? Patient and public involvement in clinical commissioning.
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):484-494. doi: 10.1111/hex.12475. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
5
Health service staff attitudes to community representatives on committees.
J Health Organ Manag. 2006;20(6):551-9. doi: 10.1108/14777260610702299.
8
Challenges to the provision of community aged care services across rural Australia: perceptions of service managers.
Rural Remote Health. 2017 Apr-Jun;17(2):4059. doi: 10.22605/RRH4059. Epub 2017 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Conflicts of interest in institutional review boards are a threat to ethical research.
Nat Med. 2023 Nov;29(11):2701-2703. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02442-0.
4
National Ethical Guidelines for biomedical and health research: Issues to ponder over.
J Postgrad Med. 2022 Jul-Sep;68(3):125-128. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_474_22.
5
Implementing community participation via interdisciplinary teams in primary care: An Irish case study in practice.
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):990-1001. doi: 10.1111/hex.12692. Epub 2018 May 16.
6
Combining professional and lay knowledge to improve patient care.
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Jan;68(666):39-40. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X694337.
7
Group affiliation in self-management: support or threat to identity?
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):159-170. doi: 10.1111/hex.12448. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
8
The role of community representatives on health service committees: staff expectations vs. reality.
Health Expect. 2011 Sep;14(3):272-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00628.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
9
Patient organizations in Finland: increasing numbers and great variation.
Health Expect. 2010 Sep;13(3):221-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00499.x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
10
Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury.
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):282-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00501.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Reflections on health care consumerism: insights from feminism.
Health Expect. 1999 Sep;2(3):150-158. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00043.x.
2
The challenge of lay partnership. It provides a different view of the world.
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):721-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.721.
3
Consulting consumers. A manager's guide to consumers.
Health Serv J. 1995 Nov 30;105(5481):28-9.
4
The rise of doctor-patient working groups.
BMJ. 1998 Nov 14;317(7169):1374-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7169.1374.
5
Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Winter;18(4):881-904. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-4-881.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验