Kreuzer K A, Rockstroh J K, Kupfer B, Spengler U
Department of Medicine, Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany.
Int J Clin Lab Res. 2000;30(4):163-8. doi: 10.1007/s005990070001.
It has been shown that the beta (C-C) chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha/beta (MIP-1alpha/beta) and RANTES, which are released by CD8+ T cells, are potent inhibitors of HIV viral replication in vitro. To investigate whether serum concentrations of these chemokines reflect such a protective effect in vivo, we measured these in peripheral blood of 60 HIV seropositive patients, 10 healthy subjects, and 10 disease controls. Values were compared with the CDC disease stages and immunological surrogate markers of disease progression, such as CD4+ count, beta2-microglobulin and 5'-neopterin serum levels. In addition, HIV RNA was measured in sera. All three chemokines were not significantly different between HIV patients and healthy individuals, nor were differences of chemokine levels between the CDC stages significant. Instead, disease controls exhibited significantly more MIP-1alpha and MIP-1beta than normals or HIV patients. Furthermore, within the HIV-seropositive subjects we did not observe any relationship with the surrogate markers of HIV disease, CD4+ count, CD4+/CD8+ ratio, beta2-microglobulin, and 5'-neopterin (all correlations NS). HIV viral load did not correlate with the measured chemokine concentrations (r < 0.1, NS). In conclusion, endogenous levels of MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and RANTES do not reflect the hypothesized protective effect on disease progression in HIV infection. Thus, despite potential beneficial effects of the investigated chemokines, other factors may equally contribute to HIV replication control in vivo.
已有研究表明,由CD8 + T细胞释放的β(C - C)趋化因子巨噬细胞炎性蛋白-1α/β(MIP - 1α/β)和调节激活正常T细胞表达和分泌的因子(RANTES)在体外是HIV病毒复制的有效抑制剂。为了研究这些趋化因子的血清浓度在体内是否反映出这种保护作用,我们在60名HIV血清阳性患者、10名健康受试者和10名疾病对照者的外周血中对其进行了测量。将这些值与疾病控制中心(CDC)的疾病阶段以及疾病进展的免疫替代标志物进行比较,如CD4 + 细胞计数、β2 - 微球蛋白和5'-新蝶呤血清水平。此外,还测量了血清中的HIV RNA。HIV患者和健康个体之间的所有三种趋化因子均无显著差异,CDC各阶段之间的趋化因子水平差异也不显著。相反,疾病对照者的MIP - 1α和MIP - 1β明显高于正常人和HIV患者。此外,在HIV血清阳性受试者中,我们未观察到与HIV疾病替代标志物、CD4 + 细胞计数、CD4 + /CD8 + 比值、β2 - 微球蛋白和5'-新蝶呤之间存在任何关系(所有相关性均无统计学意义)。HIV病毒载量与所测趋化因子浓度无关(r < 0.1,无统计学意义)。总之,MIP - 1α、MIP - 1β和RANTES的内源性水平并未反映出对HIV感染疾病进展的假设性保护作用。因此,尽管所研究的趋化因子可能具有潜在的有益作用,但其他因素可能同样有助于体内HIV复制的控制。