Liu J, Linderman M, Ouyang Z, An L, Yang J, Zhang H
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 13 Natural Resources Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Science. 2001 Apr 6;292(5514):98-101. doi: 10.1126/science.1058104.
It is generally perceived that biodiversity is better protected from human activities after an area is designated as a protected area. However, we found that this common perception was not true in Wolong Nature Reserve (southwestern China), which was established in 1975 as a "flagship" protected area for the world-renowned endangered giant pandas. Analyses of remote sensing data from pre- and post-establishment periods indicate that the reserve has become more fragmented and less suitable for giant panda habitation. The rate of loss of high-quality habitat after the reserve's establishment was much higher than before the reserve was created, and the fragmentation of high-quality habitat became far more severe. After the creation of the reserve, rates of habitat loss and fragmentation inside the reserve unexpectedly increased to levels that were similar to or higher than those outside the reserve, in contrast to the situation before the reserve was created.
人们普遍认为,一个地区被指定为保护区后,生物多样性能更好地免受人类活动的影响。然而,我们发现这种普遍看法在中国西南部的卧龙自然保护区并不成立。该保护区于1975年建立,是世界著名濒危大熊猫的“旗舰”保护区。对保护区建立前后的遥感数据进行分析表明,该保护区变得更加破碎化,对大熊猫栖息地的适宜性降低。保护区建立后优质栖息地的丧失率远高于建立前,优质栖息地的破碎化也变得更加严重。与保护区建立前的情况相反,保护区建立后,保护区内栖息地丧失和破碎化的速度意外地增加到与保护区外相似或更高的水平。