Guan Tian-Pei, Owens Jacob R, Gong Ming-Hao, Liu Gang, Ouyang Zhi-Yun, Song Yan-Ling
Ecological Security and Protection Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Mianyang Normal University, Mianyang, China.
Chengdu Research Base of Giant Panda Breeding, Chengdu, China.
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0159738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159738. eCollection 2016.
The creation of nature reserves is the most direct way to save endangered species populations and their habitat. Development of the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) nature reserve network in China was initiated in the 1960s, though the effort to create new reserves boomed considerably after the year 2000. Given this rapid development of protected areas in panda habitats, and the potential conflicting interests between conservation administrations and local economic development, it is essential to assess the role of new nature reserves in the overall giant panda conservation effort and reserve network. We utilized data from national giant panda surveys conducted in 2000 and 2012 to compare the size, spatial use, and distribution of panda populations, as well as the habitat suitability and connectivity in the Northern Qionglai Mountains between the two survey years. Our results show that although the total giant panda population in the study area did not change remarkably, local changes did occur. Most notably, the population in Wolong Nature Reserve declined by 27.3% (N = 39) and the population in Caopo Nature Reserve increased by 71.4% (N = 29) over the 12-year study period. We also found habitat suitability and availability decreased in both Wolong (12.4%) and Caopo (7.4%), but that the relative density of giant pandas declined (19.2%) and increased (84.6%) at each site, respectively. The distance between centers of high IUA were more distant in 2012 (14.1±1.9km) than that in 2000 (6.1±0.9km; t = -7.4, df = 5, p = 0.001), showing a scattered spatial pattern. Habitat availability decreased by 42% within the corridor between the two reserves, however panda occurrences in the corridor increased 24.6%. Compared to the total number of encounters, the proportion of the corridor increased 45.76%. Our results show the importance and success of the newly established Caopo to the conservation of giant pandas, and how crucial it is to identify and repair reserve corridors. Furthermore, we propose criteria for future nature reserve network management and investment, which is applicable for other endangered species conservation practices.
建立自然保护区是拯救濒危物种及其栖息地的最直接方式。中国大熊猫(Ailuropoda melanoleuca)自然保护区网络的建设始于20世纪60年代,不过在2000年之后创建新保护区的工作有了显著发展。鉴于大熊猫栖息地保护区的这种快速发展,以及保护管理部门与地方经济发展之间潜在的利益冲突,评估新自然保护区在整体大熊猫保护工作及保护区网络中的作用至关重要。我们利用2000年和2012年全国大熊猫调查的数据,比较了两个调查年份间邛崃山北段大熊猫种群的规模、空间利用和分布情况,以及栖息地适宜性和连通性。我们的结果表明,尽管研究区域内大熊猫的总数没有显著变化,但局部变化确实发生了。最显著的是,在12年的研究期内,卧龙自然保护区的大熊猫数量减少了27.3%(N = 39),而草坡自然保护区的大熊猫数量增加了71.4%(N = 29)。我们还发现,卧龙(12.4%)和草坡(7.4%)的栖息地适宜性和可用性均有所下降,但大熊猫在每个地点的相对密度分别下降了(19.2%)和增加了(84.6%)。2012年高IUA中心之间的距离(14.1±1.9公里)比2000年(6.1±0.9公里;t = -7.4,自由度 = 5,p = 0.001)更远,呈现出分散的空间格局。两个保护区之间的走廊内栖息地可用性下降了42%,然而走廊内大熊猫的出现频次增加了24.6%。与总相遇次数相比,走廊的比例增加了45.76%。我们的结果显示了新建立的草坡自然保护区对大熊猫保护的重要性和成效,以及识别和修复保护区走廊的关键程度。此外,我们提出了未来自然保护区网络管理和投资的标准,这适用于其他濒危物种的保护实践。