Coll J, Coll R
Seton Hall University, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2001 Feb;88(1):203-25. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.1.203.
In this paper two experiments support and amplify Coll and Coll's 1994 Progressively Finer Attributes Theory of Memory Trace Development. Important to the current paper are five propositions of this theory. (1) The memory trace develops along an attribute dimension from coarse/general to fine/specific attributes. (2) Forgetting is a reverse movement from fine to coarse as increasingly less fine attributes are lost. (3) A memory trace consists of a bundle of defining attributes and relating' attributes. There are no constraints on the type of attribute included in the attribute bundle or in the order of types acquired. The trace name is defined by the attribute bundle it represents. (4) Access to any defining attribute of a memory trace gives full access to all other attributes of the trace bundle. (5) In the early phases of trace development the attributes are preeminent in recall but, as familiarity with a to-be-learned item increases, the attributes become increasingly cohesive and the name assumes preeminence. As forgetting progresses, there is a return to the original state (attributes are preeminent). Exp. 1 supports Propositions 3 and 4 and Exp. 2 supports Propositions 3 and 5. Both experiments provide validation of Propositions 1 and 2 beyond that in prior work. The authors present arguments that the coarse-to-fine movement of the Progressively Finer Attributes Theory is the mechanism by which Levels of Processing operates.
在本文中,两项实验支持并扩展了科尔和科尔1994年提出的记忆痕迹发展的渐进精细属性理论。对本文而言,该理论的五个命题很重要。(1)记忆痕迹沿着一个属性维度从粗略/一般属性发展到精细/具体属性。(2)遗忘是一个从精细到粗略的反向过程,因为越来越多的精细属性丢失。(3)记忆痕迹由一组定义属性和关联属性组成。属性组中包含的属性类型或获取类型的顺序没有限制。痕迹名称由它所代表的属性组定义。(4)访问记忆痕迹的任何一个定义属性就能完全访问痕迹组的所有其他属性。(5)在痕迹发展的早期阶段,属性在回忆中占主导地位,但随着对要学习项目的熟悉程度增加,属性变得越来越连贯,名称占据主导地位。随着遗忘的进展,会回到原始状态(属性占主导地位)。实验1支持命题3和4,实验2支持命题3和5。两项实验都为命题1和2提供了比先前研究更多的验证。作者提出论点,认为渐进精细属性理论的从粗略到精细的转变是加工水平起作用的机制。