Miller P H, Bjorklund D F
University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1998 Nov;71(2):184-93. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2471.
Brainerd and Reyna (1998, this issue) have described fuzzy-trace theory as a basic-processing theory, emphasizing age differences in children's disposition to use verbatim versus gist representations. The theoretical climate of the 1980's, when fuzzy-trace theory was first formulated, is described. Fuzzy-trace theory integrated new ideas about how cognitive development was viewed into a coherent framework, which only gradually gained acceptance as critical aspects of the theory were confirmed, counterintuitive findings were predicted and demonstrated, and other researchers began applying the theory. Fuzzy-trace theory converges with other contemporary theoretical accounts in raising the general issue of the relation between two developing representational systems and is consistent with the idea that immature (a bias toward verbatim encoding) and mature (a bias toward gist encoding) have both advantages and disadvantages at different times in development. By integrating the theory with ideas from social-contextual perspectives, the theory may have a greater impact in the future for issues of social significance.
布雷纳德和雷纳(1998年,本期)将模糊痕迹理论描述为一种基础加工理论,强调儿童在使用逐字记录与要点表征倾向上的年龄差异。文中描述了20世纪80年代首次提出模糊痕迹理论时的理论环境。模糊痕迹理论将关于认知发展如何被看待的新观点整合到一个连贯的框架中,随着该理论的关键方面得到证实、反直觉的发现得到预测和证明,以及其他研究人员开始应用该理论,它才逐渐被接受。模糊痕迹理论在提出两个发展中的表征系统之间关系的一般性问题上与其他当代理论观点趋同,并且与这样一种观点一致,即不成熟的(倾向于逐字编码)和成熟的(倾向于要点编码)在发展的不同阶段都有优点和缺点。通过将该理论与社会背景视角的观点相结合,该理论未来可能会对具有社会意义的问题产生更大的影响。