Longmate J A
Department of Biostatistics, City of Hope National Medical Center and Beckman Research Institute, Duarte, CA 91010, USA.
Am J Hum Genet. 2001 May;68(5):1229-37. doi: 10.1086/320106. Epub 2001 Apr 4.
A general method is described for estimation of the power and sample size of studies relating a dichotomous phenotype to multiple interacting loci and environmental covariates. Either a simple case-control design or more complex stratified sampling may be used. The method can be used to design individual studies, to evaluate the power of alternative test statistics for complex traits, and to examine general questions of study design through explicit scenarios. The method is used here to study how the power of association tests is affected by problems of allelic heterogeneity and to investigate the potential role for collective testing of sets of related candidate genes in the presence of locus heterogeneity. The results indicate that allele-discovery efforts are crucial and that omnibus tests or collective testing of alleles can be substantially more powerful than separate testing of individual allelic variants. Joint testing of multiple candidate loci can also dramatically improve power, despite model misspecification and inclusion of irrelevant loci, but requires an a priori hypothesis defining the set of loci to investigate.
本文描述了一种通用方法,用于估计将二分表型与多个相互作用基因座及环境协变量相关联的研究的功效和样本量。既可以采用简单的病例对照设计,也可以使用更复杂的分层抽样。该方法可用于设计个体研究、评估针对复杂性状的替代检验统计量的功效,以及通过明确的情景来研究研究设计的一般性问题。本文运用该方法研究等位基因异质性问题如何影响关联检验的功效,并探讨在存在基因座异质性的情况下对相关候选基因集进行集体检验的潜在作用。结果表明,等位基因发现工作至关重要,并且对等位基因进行综合检验或集体检验可能比单独检验单个等位基因变体的功效要高得多。尽管存在模型错误设定和包含无关基因座的情况,但对多个候选基因座进行联合检验也可显著提高功效,但需要一个先验假设来定义要研究的基因座集。