de Goede C J, Keus S H, Kwakkel G, Wagenaar R C
Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospital Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Apr;82(4):509-15. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.22352.
To present a critical review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the effects of physical therapy in patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD), in terms of neurologic signs, activities of daily living (ADLs), and walking ability.
Articles published from 1966 to May 1999 were compiled by means of MEDLINE, Cochrane register of controlled trials, and CINAHL using combinations of the key words Parkinson's disease, exercise, exercise therapy, physical therapy, and group training. References presented in relevant publications were also examined. Articles written in English, German, or Dutch were included.
Studies had to meet the following selection criteria: (1) patients with PD were included in the intervention study, (2) the effects of physical therapy (PT) were evaluated, (3) the study could be classified as true or quasi-experiment, and (4) the study was published in a journal or book.
Two reviewers assessed independently the methodologic quality of the data of each included study. One reviewer extracted relevant meta-analysis data.
For each outcome measure the estimated effect size and the summary effect size (SES) were calculated, using fixed (ie, Hedges's g) and random effects models. The meta-analysis resulted in a significant homogeneous SES with regard to ADLs (.40; confidence interval [CI] = .17-.64) and stride length (.46; CI = .12-.82). The SES with regard to walking speed showed a significant heterogeneous SES, which remained significant after applying a random effects model (.49; CI = .21-.77). The SES with regard to neurologic signs was not significant (.22; CI = -.08 to .52). The small number of studies included and the shortcomings of the methodologic quality of these studies, however, bias the results of the present study.
The results of the present research synthesis support the hypothesis that Parkinson patients benefit from PT added to their standard medication.
对评估物理治疗对帕金森病(PD)患者神经体征、日常生活活动能力(ADL)及步行能力影响的研究进行批判性综述和荟萃分析。
通过MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验注册库和CINAHL,使用帕金森病、运动、运动疗法、物理治疗和团体训练等关键词组合,汇编了1966年至1999年5月发表的文章。还查阅了相关出版物中列出的参考文献。纳入英文、德文或荷兰文撰写的文章。
研究必须符合以下选择标准:(1)干预研究纳入PD患者;(2)评估物理治疗(PT)的效果;(3)该研究可归类为真实验或准实验;(4)该研究发表在期刊或书籍上。
两名评审员独立评估每项纳入研究数据的方法学质量。一名评审员提取相关的荟萃分析数据。
对于每个结局指标,使用固定效应模型(即Hedges's g)和随机效应模型计算估计效应量和汇总效应量(SES)。荟萃分析结果显示,在ADL方面(.40;置信区间[CI]=.17-.64)和步幅方面(.46;CI=.12-.82),汇总效应量具有显著的同质性。步行速度方面的汇总效应量显示出显著的异质性,应用随机效应模型后仍具有显著性(.49;CI=.21-.77)。神经体征方面的汇总效应量不显著(.22;CI=-.08至.52)。然而,纳入研究的数量较少以及这些研究方法学质量的缺陷,使本研究结果存在偏差。
本研究综合分析的结果支持以下假设:帕金森病患者在标准药物治疗基础上加用PT会从中获益。