Jager T, Vermeire T G, Rikken M G, van der Poel P
Laboratory for Ecotoxicology, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Chemosphere. 2001 Apr;43(2):257-64. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(00)00087-4.
In risk assessment of new and existing substances, it is current practice to characterise risk using a deterministic quotient of the exposure concentration, or the dose, and a no-effect level. A sense of uncertainty is tackled by introducing worst-case assumptions in the methodology. Since this procedure leads to an assessment with an unknown degree of conservatism, it is advisable to deal quantitatively with uncertainties. This paper discusses the advantages and possibilities of a probabilistic risk assessment framework, illustrated with an example calculation. Furthermore, representatives of EU Member States and the chemical industry were interviewed to find out their views on applying uncertainty analysis to risk assessment of industrial chemicals.
在新物质和现有物质的风险评估中,目前的做法是使用暴露浓度或剂量与无效应水平的确定性商来表征风险。通过在方法中引入最坏情况假设来处理不确定性。由于此程序会导致进行具有未知保守程度的评估,因此定量处理不确定性是可取的。本文讨论了概率风险评估框架的优点和可能性,并通过一个示例计算进行说明。此外,还采访了欧盟成员国和化学工业的代表,以了解他们对将不确定性分析应用于工业化学品风险评估的看法。