Suppr超能文献

辩论:将血红蛋白水平提升至正常不会改善预后。

Debate: transfusing to normal haemoglobin levels will not improve outcome.

作者信息

Alvarez G, Hébert P C, Szick S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2001;5(2):56-63. doi: 10.1186/cc987. Epub 2001 Mar 8.

Abstract

Recent evidence suggests that critically ill patients are able to tolerate lower levels of haemoglobin than was previously believed. It is our goal to show that transfusing to a level of 100 g/l does not improve mortality and other clinically important outcomes in a critical care setting. Although many questions remain, many laboratory and clinical studies, including a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT), have established that transfusing to normal haemoglobin concentrations does not improve organ failure and mortality in the critically ill patient. In addition, a restrictive transfusion strategy will reduce exposure to allogeneic transfusions, result in more efficient use of red blood cells (RBCs), save blood overall, and decrease health care costs.

摘要

近期证据表明,重症患者能够耐受比之前认为的更低水平的血红蛋白。我们的目标是证明,在重症监护环境中,将血红蛋白水平提高到100 g/l并不能改善死亡率和其他临床重要结局。尽管仍有许多问题存在,但许多实验室和临床研究,包括最近的一项随机对照试验(RCT),已经证实,将血红蛋白浓度提高到正常水平并不能改善重症患者的器官功能衰竭和死亡率。此外,限制性输血策略将减少异体输血的暴露,提高红细胞(RBC)的使用效率,总体上节省血液,并降低医疗保健成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2371/137267/0eae967776a9/cc987-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验