Clahsen H
Department of Linguistics, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, United Kingdom.
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Dec;22(6):991-1013; discussion 1014-60. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x99002228.
Following much work in linguistic theory, it is hypothesized that the language faculty has a modular structure and consists of two basic components, a lexicon of (structured) entries and a computational system of combinatorial operations to form larger linguistic expressions from lexical entries. This target article provides evidence for the dual nature of the language faculty by describing recent results of a multidisciplinary investigation of German inflection. We have examined: (1) its linguistic representation, focussing on noun plurals and verb inflection (participles), (2) processes involved in the way adults produce and comprehend inflected words, (3) brain potentials generated during the processing of inflected words, and (4) the way children acquire and use inflection. It will be shown that the evidence from all these sources converges and supports the distinction between lexical entries and combinatorial operations. Our experimental results indicate that adults have access to two distinct processing routes, one accessing (irregularly) inflected entries from the mental lexicon and another involving morphological decomposition of (regularly) inflected words into stem + affix representations. These two processing routes correspond to the dual structure of the linguistic system. Results from event-related potentials confirm this linguistic distinction at the level of brain structures. In children's language, we have also found these two processes to be clearly dissociated; regular and irregular inflection are used under different circumstances, and the constraints under which children apply them are identical to those of the adult linguistic system. Our findings will be explained in terms of a linguistic model that maintains the distinction between the lexicon and the computational system but replaces the traditional view of the lexicon as a simple list of idiosyncrasies with the notion of internally structured lexical representations.
在语言学理论方面经过大量研究之后,有人提出假设,认为语言官能具有模块化结构,由两个基本成分组成,一个是(结构化的)词条词汇表,另一个是组合操作的计算系统,用于从词条形成更大的语言表达式。本文通过描述对德语词形变化进行多学科研究的最新结果,为语言官能的双重性质提供证据。我们研究了:(1)其语言表征,重点是名词复数和动词词形变化(分词);(2)成年人生成和理解词形变化词所涉及的过程;(3)处理词形变化词时产生的脑电信号;(4)儿童习得和使用词形变化的方式。结果将表明,来自所有这些方面的证据相互印证,支持了词条与组合操作之间的区别。我们的实验结果表明,成年人有两种不同的处理路径,一种是从心理词库中获取(不规则)词形变化的词条,另一种是将(规则)词形变化的词形态分解为词干+词缀表征。这两种处理路径对应于语言系统的双重结构。事件相关电位的结果在脑结构层面证实了这种语言上的区别。在儿童语言中,我们也发现这两个过程明显分离;规则和不规则词形变化在不同情况下使用,儿童应用它们的限制与成人语言系统相同。我们的研究结果将根据一种语言模型来解释,该模型维持词汇表与计算系统之间的区别,但用内部结构化词汇表征的概念取代了将词汇表视为简单特殊情况列表的传统观点。