Maguire E A, Frith C D, Cipolotti L
Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.
Neuroimage. 2001 Apr;13(4):743-50. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0712.
In a series of three positron emission tomography experiments the functional neuroanatomy of four different types of visual stimuli was investigated within the same experimental context. The stimuli were unknown buildings, landscapes, human faces, and animal faces. The purpose of the present study was to compare the stimulus types, both within the same category and across category, by examining if, at encoding (with several seconds exposure to each stimulus) or recognition (over time scales of minutes compared to the seconds of usual perception/one-back studies), common or different neural circuits were activated for all types/categories of stimuli. Within category and although visually very different, the encoding of both buildings and landscapes activated a similar set of brain regions, including bilateral parahippocampal gyrus. This was in contrast to the encoding of both human and animal faces, both of which resulted in activation of the fusiform gyrus bilaterally. Despite the perceptual inputs being identical to those during encoding, the recognition of both buildings and landscapes activated only unilateral right parahippocampal gyrus, while recognition of both human and animal faces activated unilateral right fusiform gyrus. In addition, right superior frontal gyrus and right inferior and medial parietal areas were more active during recognition compared with encoding for all stimulus types. Overall the data identify differential patterns of activation for encoding compared with retrieval of visual stimuli. Furthermore, medial temporal structures specifically are involved in the explicit learning and long-term recognition of topographically relevant stimuli, be they buildings or landscapes, while lateral temporal structures support nontopographical learning and recognition, in this case either human or animal faces.
在一系列三个正电子发射断层扫描实验中,在相同的实验背景下研究了四种不同类型视觉刺激的功能性神经解剖学。这些刺激物是未知的建筑物、风景、人脸和动物脸。本研究的目的是通过检查在编码时(对每个刺激物暴露几秒钟)或识别时(与通常感知/单回溯研究的几秒钟相比,时间尺度为几分钟),所有类型/类别的刺激物是否激活了共同或不同的神经回路,来比较同一类别内和跨类别的刺激类型。在同一类别内,尽管在视觉上非常不同,但建筑物和风景的编码都激活了一组相似的脑区,包括双侧海马旁回。这与人脸和动物脸的编码形成对比,两者都导致双侧梭状回的激活。尽管感知输入与编码时相同,但建筑物和风景的识别仅激活了单侧右侧海马旁回,而人脸和动物脸的识别则激活了单侧右侧梭状回。此外,与所有刺激类型的编码相比,右侧额上回以及右侧顶叶下部和内侧区域在识别过程中更活跃。总体而言,数据表明视觉刺激的编码与检索相比存在不同的激活模式。此外,内侧颞叶结构特别参与了对地形相关刺激(无论是建筑物还是风景)的显性学习和长期识别,而外侧颞叶结构支持非地形学习和识别,在这种情况下是人脸或动物脸。