The Brain and Mind Institute and Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B7.
J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 26;33(26):10915-23. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0126-13.2013.
An unresolved question in our understanding of the medial temporal lobes is how functional differences between structures pertaining to stimulus category relate to the distinction between item-based and contextually based recognition-memory processes. Specifically, it remains unclear whether perirhinal cortex (PrC) supports item-based familiarity signals for all stimulus categories or whether parahippocampal cortex (PhC) may also play a role for stimulus categories that are known to engage this structure in other task contexts. Here, we used multivoxel pattern analyses of fMRI data to compare patterns of activity in humans that are associated with the perceived familiarity of faces, buildings, and chairs. During scanning, participants judged the familiarity of previously studied and novel items from all three categories. Instances in which recognition was based on recollection were removed from all analyses. In right PrC, we found patterns of activity that distinguished familiar from novel faces. By contrast, in right PhC, we observed such patterns for buildings. Familiarity signals for chairs were present in both structures but shared little overlap with the patterns observed for faces and buildings on a more fine-grained scale. In the hippocampus, we found no evidence for familiarity signals for any object category. Our findings show that both PrC and PhC contribute to the assessment of item familiarity. They suggest that PhC does not only represent episodic context but can also represent item information for some object categories in recognition-memory decisions. In turn, our findings also indicate that the involvement of PrC in representing item familiarity is not ubiquitous.
在我们对内侧颞叶的理解中,一个悬而未决的问题是,与基于项目和基于上下文的识别记忆过程区分相关的结构之间的功能差异如何。具体来说,尚不清楚是否是缘上回(PrC)支持所有刺激类别的基于项目的熟悉度信号,还是海马旁回(PhC)也可能对已知在其他任务环境中涉及该结构的刺激类别发挥作用。在这里,我们使用 fMRI 数据的多体素模式分析来比较与面孔、建筑物和椅子的感知熟悉度相关的人类活动模式。在扫描过程中,参与者判断了来自所有三个类别的先前研究和新物品的熟悉程度。在所有分析中都去除了基于回忆的识别实例。在右 PrC 中,我们发现了区分熟悉和新颖面孔的活动模式。相比之下,在右 PhC 中,我们观察到建筑物的模式。在这两个结构中都存在椅子的熟悉度信号,但在更细粒度的尺度上与面孔和建筑物的模式共享很少的重叠。在海马体中,我们没有发现任何与物体类别熟悉度信号相关的证据。我们的研究结果表明,PrC 和 PhC 都有助于评估项目的熟悉度。它们表明 PhC 不仅代表情景上下文,而且可以代表识别记忆决策中某些物体类别的项目信息。反过来,我们的研究结果也表明,PrC 参与表示项目熟悉度并非普遍存在。