Wellcome Laboratory of Neurobiology, Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London London, UK.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 10;7:850. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00850. eCollection 2013.
In this paper we discuss the work of Francis Bacon in the context of his declared aim of giving a "visual shock."We explore what this means in terms of brain activity and what insights into the brain's visual perceptive system his work gives. We do so especially with reference to the representation of faces and bodies in the human visual brain. We discuss the evidence that shows that both these categories of stimuli have a very privileged status in visual perception, compared to the perception of other stimuli, including man-made artifacts such as houses, chairs, and cars. We show that viewing stimuli that depart significantly from a normal representation of faces and bodies entails a significant difference in the pattern of brain activation. We argue that Bacon succeeded in delivering his "visual shock" because he subverted the normal neural representation of faces and bodies, without at the same time subverting the representation of man-made artifacts.
在本文中,我们将讨论弗朗西斯·培根的工作,探讨他宣称的“视觉冲击”的目的。我们探讨了这在大脑活动方面意味着什么,以及他的工作对大脑视觉感知系统的哪些方面有了深入的了解。我们特别参考了人脸和身体在人类视觉大脑中的表现。我们讨论了证据表明,与其他刺激相比,包括房屋、椅子和汽车等人造制品在内,这些类别的刺激在视觉感知中具有非常特殊的地位。我们表明,观看与正常人脸和身体表现有显著差异的刺激会导致大脑激活模式的显著差异。我们认为,培根之所以能够成功地制造出“视觉冲击”,是因为他颠覆了人脸和身体的正常神经表现,同时又没有颠覆人造制品的表现。