Suppr超能文献

依替福辛与劳拉西泮对健康受试者镇静及记忆作用的双盲平行组安慰剂对照比较[校正后]

A double blind parallel group placebo controlled comparison of sedative and mnesic effects of etifoxine and lorazepam in healthy subjects [corrected].

作者信息

Micallef J, Soubrouillard C, Guet F, Le Guern M E, Alquier C, Bruguerolle B, Blin O

机构信息

Centre de Pharmacologie Clinique et d'Evaluations Thérapeutiques et Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, UMR-CNRS-FRE-Université de la Méditerranée, Développement et Pathologie du Mouvement, Hôpital de la Timone, 13385 Marseille cedex 5, France.

出版信息

Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Jun;15(3):209-16. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-8206.2001.00025.x.

Abstract

This paper describes the psychomotor and mnesic effects of single oral doses of etifoxine (50 and 100 mg) and lorazepam (2 mg) in healthy subjects. Forty-eight healthy subjects were included in this randomized double blind, placebo controlled parallel group study [corrected]. The effects of drugs were assessed by using a battery of subjective and objective tests that explored mood and vigilance (Visual Analog Scale), attention (Barrage test), psychomotor performance (Choice Reaction Time) and memory (digit span, immediate and delayed free recall of a word list). Whereas vigilance, psychomotor performance and free recall were significantly impaired by lorazepam, neither dosage of etifoxine (50 and 100 mg) produced such effects. These results suggest that 50 and 100 mg single dose of etifoxine do not induce amnesia and sedation as compared to lorazepam.

摘要

本文描述了单剂量口服依替福辛(50毫克和100毫克)和劳拉西泮(2毫克)对健康受试者的精神运动和记忆效应。48名健康受试者纳入了这项随机双盲、安慰剂对照平行组研究[校正后]。通过一系列主观和客观测试评估药物效果,这些测试探究了情绪和警觉性(视觉模拟量表)、注意力(弹幕测试)、精神运动表现(选择反应时)和记忆(数字广度、单词列表的即时和延迟自由回忆)。劳拉西泮显著损害了警觉性、精神运动表现和自由回忆,而依替福辛的两种剂量(50毫克和100毫克)均未产生此类效果。这些结果表明,与劳拉西泮相比,50毫克和100毫克单剂量的依替福辛不会引起失忆和镇静作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验