Suppr超能文献

用于小型口腔外科手术的局部麻醉。综述。

Local anaesthetic for minor oral surgical procedures. Review.

作者信息

Kumar R, Rao S N

机构信息

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and General Surgery, College of Dental Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dent Res. 2000 Oct-Dec;11(4):163-6.

Abstract

Pain following any surgical procedure is difficult to combat by man. Analgesics can be given for some amount of symptomatic relief. The need for a long lasting local anaesthetic is with the intention to reduce the most severe nature of pain, and decrease the analgesic consumption. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of, Bupivacaine over Lidocaine for minor oral surgical procedures. The popularly used lidocaine works for 3 to 3.9 hours. This is not sufficient since the most severe nature of pain is felt six to eight hours post surgery, where as Bupivacaine has duration of action of seven to eight hours. Hence the post operative pain experienced following administration of bupivacaine was found to be considerably lesser in degree than compared to the lidocaine group. To avoid severe pain and discomfort to the patient following any minor oral surgical, the use of bupivacaine is recommended.

摘要

人类很难对抗任何外科手术后的疼痛。可以使用镇痛药来缓解一定程度的症状。使用长效局部麻醉剂的目的是减轻最严重的疼痛,并减少镇痛药的用量。本研究旨在比较布比卡因和利多卡因在小型口腔外科手术中的疗效。常用的利多卡因作用时间为3至3.9小时。这并不足够,因为术后6至8小时会感到最严重的疼痛,而布比卡因的作用持续时间为7至8小时。因此,与利多卡因组相比,使用布比卡因后术后疼痛程度明显较轻。为避免小型口腔外科手术后给患者带来严重疼痛和不适,建议使用布比卡因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验