Suppr超能文献

罗哌卡因1毫克/毫升,加芬太尼2微克/毫升用于分娩期间的硬膜外镇痛。给药方式重要吗?

Ropivacaine 1 mg/ml, plus fentanyl 2 microg/ml for epidural analgesia during labour. Is mode of administration important?

作者信息

Smedvig J P, Soreide E, Gjessing L

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Rogaland Central Hospital, Stavanger, N-4068 Norway.

出版信息

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 May;45(5):595-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045005595.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with a moderate to high concentration of bupivacaine in obstetrics has been shown to give comparable analgesia and even higher level of satisfaction compared to continuous epidural infusion. We hypothesised that the use of a very low concentration technique (ropivacaine/fentanyl) might result in excessive dosing in the PCEA group, more motor blockade and a negative impact on spontaneous delivery rate.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, double-blind study of 60 nulliparous women at term comparing low concentration ropivacaine/fentanyl administered in either patient-controlled or fixed continuous infusion mode. Parturients with known predictors of painful deliveries, i.e. breech presentation, primary induction of labour, were not included. Deliveries within 90 min from the start of epidural analgesia were omitted from the evaluation.

RESULTS

We found that both groups required a mean of 12 ml/h low concentration mixture (loading and midwife rescue boluses included). There was no difference between groups with respect to spontaneous delivery rate (71%). This low concentration technique resulted in haemodynamic stability without crystalloid preloading, infusion or vasopressor use. Motor blockade of clinical importance was not detected in any patient.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that epidural use of ropivacaine 1 mg/ml+fentanyl 2 microg/ml provides effective analgesia with equal volume requirements irrespective of administration mode, with a high spontaneous delivery rate. Choice of PCEA or CEI (continuous epidural infusion) should be directed by other considerations, most importantly compliance of midwife and possible reduction in workload for anaesthesiology staff.

摘要

背景

在产科中,使用中高浓度布比卡因的患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)与持续硬膜外输注相比,已显示出相当的镇痛效果,甚至患者满意度更高。我们假设,使用极低浓度技术(罗哌卡因/芬太尼)可能会导致PCEA组用药过量、更多运动阻滞,并对自然分娩率产生负面影响。

方法

我们对60名足月未产妇进行了一项随机双盲研究,比较以患者自控或固定持续输注模式给予低浓度罗哌卡因/芬太尼的效果。已知有分娩疼痛预测因素的产妇,即臀位、首次引产者,不纳入研究。从硬膜外镇痛开始90分钟内的分娩不纳入评估。

结果

我们发现两组平均每小时需要12毫升低浓度混合液(包括负荷剂量和助产士急救推注量)。两组的自然分娩率(71%)无差异。这种低浓度技术在未进行晶体预负荷、输注或使用血管升压药的情况下实现了血流动力学稳定。未在任何患者中检测到具有临床意义的运动阻滞。

结论

我们得出结论,硬膜外使用1毫克/毫升罗哌卡因+2微克/毫升芬太尼可提供有效的镇痛效果,无论给药方式如何,所需容量相同,自然分娩率高。PCEA或CEI(持续硬膜外输注)的选择应基于其他考虑因素,最重要的是助产士的依从性以及麻醉科工作人员工作量可能的减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验