• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于测量环孢素A血药浓度的荧光偏振免疫分析(TDx)和酶竞争性免疫分析(EMIT 2000)的比较。

Comparison of the fluorescent polarization (TDx) and the enzymatic competitive (EMIT 2000) immune assays for the measurement of cyclosporin A blood concentration.

作者信息

David-Neto E, Ballarati C A, Freitas O J, Lemos F C, Nahas W C, Arap S, Kalil J

机构信息

Hospital Sírio Libanes.

出版信息

Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2000 Nov-Dec;55(6):207-12. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812000000600003.

DOI:10.1590/s0041-87812000000600003
PMID:11313660
Abstract

Evaluation of Cyclosporin A (CyA) blood concentration is imperative in solid organ transplantation in order to achieve maximal immunosuppression with the least side effects. We compared the results of whole blood concentrations of CyA in 50 blood samples simultaneously evaluated by the fluorescent polarization immune assay (TDx) and the enzymatic competitive immune assay (EMIT 2000). There was a strong correlation between both kits for any range of CyA blood concentration (R=0.99, p<0.001). The within-run and between-days coefficient of variation were less than 4% for both assays. The cost for each CyA measurement was 50% lower for the EMIT assay when compared to the TDx assay. We concluded that the EMIT is as accurate as the TDx in measuring CyA blood concentration and has the advantage of a lower cost, as well as the possibility of widespread access to the EMIT methodology in contrast to the TDx equipment, allowing the laboratory to perform several routines within a working day.

摘要

在实体器官移植中,评估环孢素A(CyA)血药浓度对于以最小的副作用实现最大程度的免疫抑制至关重要。我们比较了通过荧光偏振免疫分析法(TDx)和酶竞争性免疫分析法(EMIT 2000)同时评估的50份血样中CyA全血浓度的结果。对于任何范围的CyA血药浓度,两种试剂盒之间都存在很强的相关性(R = 0.99,p < 0.001)。两种检测方法的批内和批间变异系数均小于4%。与TDx检测法相比,EMIT检测法每次检测CyA的成本低50%。我们得出结论,在测量CyA血药浓度方面,EMIT与TDx一样准确,并且具有成本较低的优势,而且与TDx设备相比,EMIT方法更有可能广泛应用,使实验室能够在一个工作日内完成多项常规检测。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the fluorescent polarization (TDx) and the enzymatic competitive (EMIT 2000) immune assays for the measurement of cyclosporin A blood concentration.用于测量环孢素A血药浓度的荧光偏振免疫分析(TDx)和酶竞争性免疫分析(EMIT 2000)的比较。
Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2000 Nov-Dec;55(6):207-12. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812000000600003.
2
Comparison of cyclosporine measurement in whole blood by high-performance liquid chromatography, monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay, and monoclonal enzyme-multiplied immunoassay.高效液相色谱法、单克隆荧光偏振免疫分析法和单克隆酶放大免疫分析法测定全血中环孢素的比较。
Ther Drug Monit. 1992 Aug;14(4):327-32. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199208000-00012.
3
Evaluation of the new AxSYM cyclosporine assay: comparison with TDx monoclonal whole blood and Emit cyclosporine assays.
Clin Chem. 1999 Mar;45(3):432-5.
4
The EMIT Cyclosporine Assay: development of application protocols for the Boehringer Mannheim Hitachi 911 and 917 analyzers.EMIT环孢素检测法:用于勃林格曼海姆日立911和917分析仪的应用方案开发
Clin Biochem. 1997 Mar;30(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(96)00162-2.
5
Progress report of an external quality assessment scheme for cyclosporine assay.环孢素检测外部质量评估计划的进展报告
Ther Drug Monit. 1996 Jun;18(3):273-9. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199606000-00009.
6
[Measuring cyclosporine levels in whole blood in kidney transplantation].[肾移植中全血中环孢素水平的测定]
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 1998 Jul-Sep;44(3):176-8. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42301998000300003.
7
Evaluation of the AxSYM CyA assay compared with HPLC, TDx monoclonal and EMIT with both pretreatments.对AxSYM环孢素A检测法与高效液相色谱法、TDx单克隆检测法以及两种预处理方法下的酶倍增免疫测定法的比较评估。
Transplant Proc. 1998 Dec;30(8):4045-7. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(98)01334-7.
8
Comparison of cyclosporine blood levels measured by radioimmunoassay and TDx assay using monoclonal antibodies.采用放射免疫分析法和使用单克隆抗体的TDx分析法对环孢素血药浓度进行比较。
Ther Drug Monit. 1991 Sep;13(5):461-3. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199109000-00012.
9
Cyclosporine A assays: comparison between radioimmunoassay and fluorescent polarization immunoassay technique by TDx, and the clinical significance of the polyclonal:monoclonal TDx ratio.环孢素A检测:放射免疫分析与TDx荧光偏振免疫分析技术的比较,以及多克隆:单克隆TDx比值的临床意义。
Transplant Proc. 1994 Oct;26(5):2818-9.
10
Cyclosporin whole blood immunoassays (AxSYM, CEDIA, and Emit): a critical overview of performance characteristics and comparison with HPLC.环孢素全血免疫测定法(AxSYM、CEDIA和Emit):性能特征的批判性综述及与高效液相色谱法的比较
Clin Chem. 1998 Oct;44(10):2158-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations of Diagnostic Tests in Brazil: How accurate are the results?巴西诊断测试健康经济评估的系统评价:结果的准确性如何?
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2017 Aug;72(8):499-509. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2017(08)08.