Ewart S L, Schott H C, Robison R L, Dwyer R M, Eberhart S W, Walker R D
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1314, USA.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2001 Apr 1;218(7):1145-51. doi: 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1145.
To determine sources of Salmonella organisms in a veterinary teaching hospital, compare bacterial culture with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for detection of Salmonella organisms in environmental samples, and evaluate the effects of various disinfectants on detection of Salmonella organisms on surface materials.
Prospective study.
Fecal samples from 638 hospitalized horses and 783 environmental samples.
Standard bacterial culture techniques were used; the PCR test amplified a segment of the Salmonella DNA. Five disinfectants were mixed with Salmonella suspensions, and bacterial culture was performed. Swab samples were collected from 7 surface materials after inoculation of the surfaces with Salmonella Typhimurium, with or without addition of a disinfectant, and submitted for bacterial culture and PCR testing.
Salmonella organisms were detected in fecal samples from 35 (5.5%) horses. For environmental samples, the proportion of positive bacterial culture results (1/783) was significantly less than the proportion of positive PCR test results (110/783), probably because of detection of nonviable DNA by the PCR test. Detection of Salmonella organisms varied with the surface material tested, the method of detection (bacterial culture vs PCR testing), and the presence and type of disinfectant.
Results of the present study suggested that Salmonella organisms can be isolated from feces of hospitalized horses and a variety of environmental surfaces in a large animal hospital. Although recovery of Salmonella organisms was affected by surface material and disinfectant, bleach was the most effective disinfectant on the largest number of surfaces tested.
确定一家兽医教学医院中沙门氏菌的来源,比较细菌培养与聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测在环境样本中检测沙门氏菌的效果,并评估各种消毒剂对表面材料上沙门氏菌检测的影响。
前瞻性研究。
638匹住院马匹的粪便样本和783份环境样本。
采用标准细菌培养技术;PCR检测扩增沙门氏菌DNA片段。将五种消毒剂与沙门氏菌悬液混合并进行细菌培养。在用鼠伤寒沙门氏菌接种表面后,从7种表面材料上采集拭子样本,无论是否添加消毒剂,然后进行细菌培养和PCR检测。
在35匹(5.5%)马匹的粪便样本中检测到沙门氏菌。对于环境样本,细菌培养阳性结果的比例(1/783)显著低于PCR检测阳性结果的比例(110/783),这可能是因为PCR检测能检测到无活力的DNA。沙门氏菌的检测因所测试的表面材料、检测方法(细菌培养与PCR检测)以及消毒剂的存在和类型而异。
本研究结果表明,在一家大型动物医院中,沙门氏菌可从住院马匹的粪便和各种环境表面分离出来。虽然沙门氏菌的检出受表面材料和消毒剂的影响,但在测试的大多数表面上,漂白剂是最有效的消毒剂。